PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Differential Cross-Section Analysis Using Thermal Volkov Wave Functions and Gaussian-Screened Potentials in Laser-Assisted Scattering

DPDol Raj PaudelTribhuvan UniversityBPBibek PandeyTribhuvan UniversityMDMadhurendra Lal DasTribhuvan University

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze how different polarizations and environments influence electron scattering in Gaussian-screened potentials.
  • Developed a theoretical model using thermal volkov wave function.
  • Derived scattering and transition matrices via the Kroll-Watson approximation.
  • Calculated differential cross-section for electron scattering in various environments.
  • Differential cross-section is highest for elliptical polarization, then circular, and lowest for linear.
  • Higher differential cross-section observed in thermal environments compared to nonthermal ones.
  • Screening parameters shift resonance positions and increase cross-section values at higher levels.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to study the scattering behavior of electrons in a Gaussian-screened potential under polarized laser fields (linear, circular, and elliptical) within thermal and nonthermal environments. For this purpose, we developed a theoretical model using the thermal Volkov wave function to describe electron dynamics in the Gaussian-screened potential. Using the thermal Volkov wave function, we derived the scattering and transition matrices via the Kroll-Watson approximation. From the transition matrix, the differential cross-section was obtained, which directly characterizes the scattering behavior of electrons in the Gaussian-screened potential. The developed differential cross-section model was computed to analyze electron behavior under thermal and nonthermal conditions. Observations indicate that the differential cross-section is highest for elliptical polarization, followed by circular and linear polarizations. Additionally, the differential cross-section is greater in thermal environments compared to nonthermal ones. Also, the screening parameters significantly affect resonance positions and differential cross section magnitudes, shifting peaks toward smaller angles and increasing cross-section values at higher screening. Distance separation studies reveal contrasting trends between thermal and non-thermal regimes, and photon energy variations highlight polarization reversals at higher energies. The study demonstrates that differential cross section can be effectively manipulated by tuning polarization, screening, temperature, and scattering angle. This study shows that electron scattering with Gaussian-screened potentials can be controlled by tuning polarization, screening, temperature, and scattering angle, which has practical applications in plasma physics, fusion energy, and semiconductor technology. The findings also provide insights for advanced material processing, space plasma modeling, and the development of laser-based diagnostic tools.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Paudel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8b2bc08abd80d5bbee0https://doi.org/10.57647/jtap.2026.8615.0306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Theoretical Study of Positron-Electron Scattering with Thermal-Volkov Wavefunction2025
  2. 2Differential Cross Section With Volkov-Thermal Wave Function in Coulomb Potential2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Comparative study of fast-electron-impact ionization of a hydrogen atom in circularly and linearly polarized laser fields2024
  4. 4Wide energy range cross section of elastic electron scattering in matter: dependence of dynamical screening of target atoms on electron velocity2024
  5. 5Scattering of ultrashort electron wave packets: optical theorem, differential phase contrast and angular asymmetries2024 · 2 citations