PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Bone Marrow Transplantation1 citationsOpen Access

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)- or alemtuzumab-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients 40 years and older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: a study from the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party

GBGesine BugGoethe University FrankfurtMLMyriam LabopinInsermJBJennifer L. ByrneNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ATG versus alemtuzumab in preventing graft-versus-host disease in older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after transplantation.
  • Retrospective analysis of 90 patients aged 40 years and older with ALL.
  • Pair-matching based on age and ALL subtype for HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT.
  • Evaluation of two different in vivo T-cell depletion therapies: ATG and alemtuzumab, within reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.
  • Two-year leukemia-free survival rates were 56.4% for alemtuzumab and 50.7% for ATG, showing no significant difference (p=0.34).
  • Overall survival rates were comparable at 62.7% for alemtuzumab and 62.9% for ATG (p=0.67).
  • Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality were similar between both treatment groups, indicating similar efficacy.
  • GVHD and infections were common causes of mortality in both groups.

Abstract

For patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains standard of care. In the setting of an HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT, in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) for prophylaxis of graft versus host disease (GVHD) relies on anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in Europe and alemtuzumab in the UK. In a retrospective study from the EBMT registry, we pair-matched 90 ALL patients aged ≥40 years transplanted in CR1 according to age (median 56 years) and ALL subtype (37.8% Ph-negative B-ALL, 46.7% Ph-positive B-ALL, 15.6% T-ALL). Reduced-intensity conditioning included fludarabine/melphalan (94.4%) in the alemtuzumab and fludarabine/busulfan (36.7%), fludarabine/total body irradiation (21.1%), fludarabine/melphalan (14.4%) and thiotepa/busulfan/fludarabine (13.3%) in the ATG group. Two-year leukemia-free and overall survival were similar between groups (Alemtuzumab: 56.4% vs ATG: 50.7%, HR 0.82, p = 0.34, and 62.7% vs 62.9%, HR 0.91, p = 0.67), as were cumulative incidence of relapse (23.7% vs 23.9%, HR 0.89, p = 0.69) and non-relapse mortality (19.9% vs 25.4%, HR 0.75, p = 0.32), resulting in similar GVHD- and relapse-free survival (GRFS) of 48.9% vs 42.1%, HR 0.8, p = 0.24. With GVHD and infections as main reasons for death in both groups, we conclude that both IS strategies are both safe for RIC HCT of these ALL patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bug et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8cfbc08abd80d5bc208https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-026-02805-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper