PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 9, 2026Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

External validation of the Ramathibodi paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia recurrence score and development of a refined prediction model in a Hong Kong emergency department adult cohort: A retrospective study

View Full Paper
MCMan Yu Chan

Key Result

A refined prediction score for 24-hour PSVT recurrence achieved an AUC of 0.827 (95% CI 0.764-0.891), offering improved discrimination over the original Ramathibodi score.

Key Points

  • The study aims to validate the Ramathibodi PSVT recurrence score and develop a more accurate local prediction model.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study at Tseung Kwan O Hospital ED.
  • Included adults with PSVT treated with up to 3 adenosine doses.
  • Assessed score performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
  • Used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for a new score.
  • Out of 278 patients, 42 (15.1%) experienced recurrence.
  • Original score had an AUC of 0.782, indicating moderate predictive ability.
  • Refined score achieved an AUC of 0.827, demonstrating improved discrimination.
  • Predicted recurrence rates were consistent with observed rates across different scores.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=278)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a refined prediction model improve the prediction of 24-hour PSVT recurrence compared to the Ramathibodi score in adult ED patients treated with adenosine?

P
Population
278 adults with PSVT treated with ≤3 adenosine doses at a Hong Kong emergency department, assessed for 24-hour recurrence.
E
Exposure
Refined PSVT recurrence prediction score (incorporating postconversion heart rate >100 bpm, ≥2 adenosine doses, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease)
C
Comparator
Original Ramathibodi PSVT recurrence score
O
Outcome
24-hour PSVT recurrencehard clinical

A refined 5-point clinical score using postconversion heart rate, adenosine doses, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease accurately predicts 24-hour PSVT recurrence in the emergency department.

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUC 0.827 (95% CI 0.764-0.891)

Abstract

Abstract Background Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) recurrence after adenosine treatment is common in emergency departments (EDs), but predictive tools require validation. Objectives To externally validate the Ramathibodi PSVT recurrence score in a Hong Kong ED cohort and develop a refined local model for predicting 24‐h recurrence. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults (≥18 years) with PSVT treated with ≤3 adenosine doses at Tseung Kwan O Hospital ED (July 2020–June 2025). Data were extracted from electronic records. The original score's performance was assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors for a new score. Results Of 278 patients, 42 (15.1%) had recurrence. The original score had AUC 0.782 (95% CI 0.706–0.858), with good calibration ( p = 0.539). A new score (postconversion heart rate >100 bpm: 1 point; ≥2 adenosine doses: 2 points; hypertension: 1 point; and ischemic heart disease: 1 point; total 0–5) achieved AUC 0.827 (95% CI 0.764–0.891). Observed recurrence rates aligned with predictions (e.g., score 0: 1.1% and score 5: 80.0%). Conclusions The Ramathibodi score performed moderately in this cohort. The refined score offers improved discrimination, aiding ED risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Man Yu Chan (2026) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) (n=278). Refined PSVT recurrence prediction score vs. Original Ramathibodi score was evaluated on 24-hour PSVT recurrence (AUC 0.827, 95% CI 0.764-0.891). A refined prediction score for 24-hour PSVT recurrence achieved an AUC of 0.827 (95% CI 0.764-0.891), offering improved discrimination over the original Ramathibodi score.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af235f3eac3accde8a1705https://doi.org/10.1002/hkj2.70090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper