PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026European Journal of Radiology3 citationsOpen Access

Assessing coronary in-stent restenosis using ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT: results from a two-center study

View Full Paper
UJUday JadavMHMuhammad Taha HagarPKP. Kulyassa

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrahigh-resolution PCD-CT for detecting coronary in-stent restenosis.
  • Identified consecutive patients with coronary stents who underwent CCTA.
  • Used dual-source PCD-CT for imaging reconstructions at 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm slice thickness.
  • Validated UHR scanning results against invasive coronary angiography.
  • Identified 17 non-obstructive and 27 obstructive ISR cases via ICA.
  • 0.2 mm UHR improved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for non-obstructive ISR compared to 0.4 mm images.
  • Achieved higher diagnostic accuracy in small-caliber stents for both non-obstructive and obstructive ISR.

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction To assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT for detecting obstructive and non-obstructive coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR), using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference. Methods Consecutive patients with coronary stents who underwent clinically indicated coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on a dual-source PCD-CT were retrospectively identified from two academic centers. All UHR scans were reconstructed at 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm slice thickness, the latter served as an energy-integrating detector CT-like proxy. Series were assessed for the presence of non-obstructive (Results Fifty patients (16.0% women; 70.9 ± 10.8 years) with 106 coronary stents were included. ICA identified 17 non-obstructive and 27 obstructive ISR. Non-obstructive ISR was detected in 10 stents on 0.2 mm UHR and 14 on 0.4 mm EID-like standard-resolution reconstructions.Obstructive ISR was described in 26 (0.2 mm) vs. 32 (0.4 mm) stents, respectively. The proportion of evaluable stents increased from 91.5% based on 0.4 mm to 99.1% with 0.2 mm UHR. Compared with standard-resolution images, 0.2-mm UHR improved non-obstructive ISR sensitivity (90.5%vs82.9%), specificity (100.0%vs78.5%), and accuracy (96.2%vs80.2%); and in obstructive ISR, specificity (98.7%vs82.3%), positive predictive value (96.3%vs64.1%), and accuracy (98.1%vs84.9%). Thin-slice UHR achieved higher accuracy in small-caliber stents (Conclusion UHR PCD-CT demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy and significant improvements in ISR detection compared to the quasi-standard reconstructions, including non-obstructive and small-caliber stent ISR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jadav et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af944f70916d39fea4b562https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112766
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper