PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Education and Information Technologies0 citationsOpen Access

The AI scaffold and engagement spectrum as a novel UDL-aligned system for supporting students with dyslexia

ARAnjana Madhav RamSSSara SaraviYYYanning Yang

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how generative AI can be safely integrated into academic settings for students with dyslexia.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with Student Support and Wellbeing Services (SSWS) specialists.
  • Administered an online survey to gather student feedback.
  • Utilized a convergent parallel mixed-methods design emphasizing qualitative insights.
  • Identified challenges in academic writing, critical reading, and time management among students with dyslexia.
  • Found inconsistent adoption of AI and assistive tools, raising concerns about academic integrity.
  • Proposed an AI Engagement Spectrum for instructors and an AI Scaffold for students to enhance support and structure.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing higher education, offering new opportunities to support diverse learners, including students with dyslexia, while raising important questions about ethics and assessment. Existing work on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and assistive technologies highlights persistent barriers in reading, writing and planning, but there is limited guidance on how generative AI (GenAI) can be integrated into academic work safely and accessibly. This study addresses that gap through a convergent parallel mixed-methods design with qualitative priority (QUAL + quan). Semi-structured interviews with specialist Student Support and Wellbeing Services (SSWS) were conducted alongside an online student survey to identify recurring challenges, current tool use and attitudes towards AI. The analysis reveals difficulties with academic writing, critical reading and time management, patchy and sometimes unsustainable adoption of assistive tools and AI, and uncertainty about acceptable AI use and its implications for academic integrity. In response, the paper proposes a dual-component, UDL-aligned system for responsible AI-supported assessment. The instructor-facing AI Engagement Spectrum helps academics set clear, assignment-specific rules for permissible AI use, grounded in constructive alignment. The student-facing AI Scaffold translates these rules into a structured workflow that guides students with dyslexia through reading, planning, drafting and revising with AI support while preserving authorship and critical engagement. The primary contribution is a transferable framework that links institutional policy, pedagogical intent and students’ study practices. It offers SSWSs, lecturers and educational designers a practical starting point for implementing AI in ways that are accessible, transparent and focused on supporting students with dyslexia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ram et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af949670916d39fea4b8echttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13934-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Universal design for learning and artificial intelligence in the digital era: Fostering inclusion and autonomous learning2024 · 59 citations
  2. 2Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment1996 · 3,930 citations
  3. 3Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education2023 · 2,179 citations
  4. 4Neurodiversity and cognitive load in online learning: A systematic review with narrative synthesis2024 · 28 citations
  5. 5Assessment and learning outcomes for generative AI in higher education: A scoping review on current research status and trends2024 · 70 citations