PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026European Journal of Nutrition5 citationsOpen Access

Are European diets healthy and sustainable? Evidence from nine countries using the planetary health diet framework

AMAgustin R. MirandaJMJoseph M. M. MeunierSVSofia Romagosa Vilarnau

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate adherence to the Planetary Health Diet across nine European nations and understand dietary patterns.
  • Used nationally representative dietary surveys from nine European countries post-2013.
  • Evaluated food group compliance and overall adherence using three dietary indices.
  • Conducted multivariate regression analyses to explore associations with demographic factors.
  • European diets showed a low adherence to the Planetary Health Diet.
  • Spain, Portugal, and the Netherlands had better PHD alignment compared to Hungary, the UK, and Estonia.
  • Low scores were largely due to high intake of red meat and added sugars, especially pork.

Abstract

Contemporary food systems pose challenges for both human and planetary health. This study aimed to assess and compare adherence to the Planetary Health Diet (PHD) in nine European countries. Nationally representative dietary surveys (post-2013) from Estonia, Finland, France, Hungary, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, with ≥ 2 non-consecutive 24-hour recalls, were used (n = 16,083 adults). Adherence to the PHD was assessed at two levels: (1) food group compliance, evaluated as the alignment with PHD target values and recommended ranges; (2) overall adherence, captured by three valid dietary indices. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify associations with demographic factors. Dietary patterns across Europe were characterised by insufficient intake of plant-based foods (whole grains, legumes, nuts, vegetables, and unsaturated oils) relative to PHD targets, alongside excessive consumption of foods to limit (red meat, saturated fats, and added sugars). Spain, Portugal, and the Netherlands showed comparatively better alignment with the PHD, whereas Hungary, the United Kingdom, and Estonia had the lowest scores. Red meat, particularly pork, and added sugars were the primary contributors to low scores across PHD indices. Being female, older, and having a higher level of education were positively associated with PHD adherence. European diets show systematic deviations from the PHD. Targeted and multilevel policies are needed to promote healthy and sustainable diets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miranda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af949670916d39fea4b8f2https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-026-03929-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mapping of the adherence to the planetary health diet in 11 European countries: comparison of different diet quality indices as a result of the PLAN’EAT project2025 · 6 citations
  2. 2Sustainable and healthy diet index (SHDI) unveils regional differences in Europe and Northern Africa: findings from the SysOrg study2025
  3. 3Associations between the EAT-Lancet Index, food group consumption and Eatwell Guide adherence in UK adults2025
  4. 4Assessing alignment of Swiss diets with the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet recommendations2026
  5. 5Associations Between Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet and Nutritional Adequacy, and Sociodemographic Factors Among Australian Adults2026 · 1 citations