PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Journal of Sensory Studies0 citations

Sensory Descriptors of Geosmin and Variable Sensitivity: A Multilocation Evaluation of US Consumers

View Full Paper
RARyan ArdoinJLJeanne M. LeaRDRebecca A. Dupre

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how native language, modality, and concentration influence sensory descriptors for geosmin in consumers.
  • Conducted evaluations at testing centers in three US regions: Midwest, Northeast, South.
  • Participants selected sensory descriptors for geosmin solutions at varying concentrations.
  • Rated perceived intensity of geosmin on a 4-point scale.
  • The term 'earthy' was the most commonly selected descriptor overall.
  • 'Beets' was particularly favored by consumers in the Northeast.
  • Non-native English speakers preferred descriptors like 'moldy' and avoided 'dirt.'
  • 8.6% of consumers showed signs of anosmia to high concentrations of geosmin.

Abstract

ABSTRACT In consumer food/beverage research, selecting appropriate sensory descriptors is necessary to isolate attributes of interest and validly attribute them to associated causes. The odorous compound geosmin was used to investigate effects of native language, modality (aroma vs. taste), and concentration on consumers' preferred sensory descriptors. Consumers recruited at three US regional testing centers—Midwest ( n = 186), Northeast ( n = 114), South ( n = 188)—selected the most appropriate terms for smell and taste of (+/−)‐geosmin solutions (control = 0 ng/L; low = 20 ng/L; medium = 200 ng/L; high = 1000 ng/L). Perceived intensity was rated on a 4‐point categorical scale. Consumer sample, language, and concentration had significant ( α = 0.05) effects on word choice. Earthy was most selected overall, but beets was favored in the Northeast. Non‐native English speakers were more likely to select moldy and less likely to select dirt. At the high concentration, 8.6% of consumers appeared anosmic to GSM. These results highlight the importance of considering linguistic features and sensitivity of the target population when designing sensory tests.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ardoin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94da70916d39fea4be12https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.70120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper