PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Associations between tattooed body surface area and maladaptive personality traits in a community sample

MAMarios AdonisMSMark J. M. SullmanAAAigli Athanasiadou

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between tattoo coverage and maladaptive personality traits in a community sample.
  • Participants completed the PID-5-BF and a Tattoo Coverage Tool to estimate tattooed body surface area (tBSA).
  • Statistical analyses included t-tests, correlations, and hierarchical regressions adjusted for age, sex, and socioeconomic status.
  • Focus was on dimensional maladaptive traits rather than categorical distinctions.
  • Tattooed participants exhibited higher scores on Disinhibition and total PID-5-BF compared to non-tattooed individuals.
  • tBSA significantly correlated with Antagonism and Disinhibition traits.
  • Antagonism was found to be a significant predictor of tBSA variance.
  • Men showed higher tBSA and maladaptive scores, while women had higher scores on Negative Affectivity.

Abstract

Abstract Evidence for personality differences between tattooed and non-tattooed adults is mixed. Assessing dimensional maladaptive traits may help clarify these associations. A community sample of adults in Cyprus ( N = 280; M = 28.0, SD = 9.5; range 18 to 64) completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form Adult (PID-5-BF) and a Tattoo Coverage Tool estimating the percentage of body surface area tattooed (tBSA). Analyses included t-tests, correlations, and hierarchical regressions controlling for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. More than half (58.6%) of the participants reported having at least one tattoo. Compared with non-tattooed participants, tattooed participants scored higher on Disinhibition ( d = 0.47, p < .01) and on the PID-5-BF total ( d = 0.29, p = .02). tBSA correlated with Antagonism ( r = .26, p < .01), Disinhibition ( r = .21, p < .01), and the PID-5-BF total ( r = .16, p = .01). Tattoo count showed weaker associations (Disinhibition r = .14, p < .05; Psychoticism r = .12, p < .05). In regressions, Antagonism alone explained 6.8% of the variance in tBSA ( p < .001) and Disinhibition alone explained 4.6% ( p < .001). In the joint model, Antagonism and Disinhibition explained 7.7% of the variance in tBSA ( p < .001), with Antagonism emerging as a significant predictor ( p < .01). Men reported higher tBSA and higher Antagonism, Detachment, Disinhibition, Psychoticism, and PID-5-BF total scores; women scored higher on Negative Affectivity. Tattoo presence was associated with higher Disinhibition and a higher overall maladaptive trait load, while Antagonism best tracked tBSA. tBSA was more sensitive than counts for detecting trait associations. Findings support AMPD-aligned assessment and the use of tBSA in community research on tattooing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adonis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94da70916d39fea4be1fhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42987-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper