PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026ChemistrySelect0 citations

Magnetic Activated Carbon Prepared From Hazelnut Shell as Supercapacitor Electrodes

View Full Paper
PÖPelin ÖzpınarCDCeren DoğanHDHakan Demiral

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the performance of electrodes made from magnetic activated carbon derived from hazelnut shells, focusing on the impact of different binders.
  • Developed magnetic activated carbon from hazelnut shells using a one-step activation method.
  • Fabricated supercapacitor electrodes with PTFE and PVDF binders.
  • Conducted comprehensive electrochemical analyses including cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
  • PVDF-based electrodes achieved higher capacitance (213.33) compared to PTFE-based electrodes (194.22) at a current density of 0.75.
  • Impedance modeling indicated that PVDF improves pore-confinement charge storage, while PTFE enhances surface-controlled charge transfer.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The development of high‐performance electrode materials remains critical for advancing next‐generation supercapacitors. Here, we present a magnetic activated carbon (MAC) derived from hazelnut shells through a one‐step activation route, yielding an exceptionally porous structure with a specific surface area of 2092 and a micropore volume of 0.75 . Leveraging this high‐surface‐area carbon, electrodes were fabricated using two commonly employed binders— polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)—to elucidate how binder selection governs electrochemical behavior. Comprehensive electrochemical analyses (CV, GCD, and EIS) revealed a marked binder‐dependent performance: at 0.75 , PVDF‐based electrodes delivered a higher capacitance (213.33 ) than their PTFE counterparts (194.22 ). Impedance modeling further showed that PVDF enhances pore‐confined charge storage, whereas PTFE favors surface‐controlled processes. These contrasting mechanisms highlight binder selection as a decisive design parameter. Overall, the results demonstrate that PVDF is advantageous for low‐current applications requiring efficient pore utilization, while PTFE is better suited for high‐current operation where rapid surface charge transfer is essential.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Özpınar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94fa70916d39fea4c077https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202505900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper