PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Animal Welfare Monitor: Raising the Bar for Species-Specific Welfare Evaluation Using Welfare Quality® Principles

View Full Paper
ARAmélie RomainLBLéa BriardGLGwenaël Leroutier

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a species-specific animal welfare evaluation protocol leveraging Welfare Quality principles.
  • Adaptation of Welfare Quality principles to zoological settings.
  • Development of a four-level hierarchical structure linking taxonomic knowledge to species-level protocols.
  • Creation of tailored questionnaires for housing, nutrition, health, and behaviour assessments.
  • Integration of data entry with visual documentation for improved context.
  • AWM has been implemented in 14 zoos with over 1000 assessments conducted.
  • More than 15,000 behavioural observations were recorded.
  • AWM covers 87 different species, showcasing its broad applicability.
  • The protocol demonstrates feasibility for routine welfare evaluations, supporting positive animal welfare outcomes.

Abstract

Assessing zoo animal welfare can involve generic evaluations or targeted, species-specific protocols. While the latter offer greater precision, their development is often limited by species diversity and the lack of validated indicators. The Animal Welfare Monitor® (AWM) protocol addresses these challenges by adapting Welfare Quality® principles to zoological contexts. Its core innovation is a four-level hierarchical structure (base, order, family, species) linking broad taxonomic knowledge to species-level protocols. This enables tailored questionnaires for each species, including data-deficient taxa, by leveraging information from related groups. Questionnaires, covering housing, nutrition, health, and behaviour, are complemented by behavioural observations. AWM currently covers 87 species (69 mammals, 15 birds, 2 amphibians, 1 reptile) and constitutes a substantial database of species-specific welfare assessment protocols embedded within a single, standardised methodological framework. Between 2021 and 2025, 14 zoos conducted over 1000 assessments and 15,000 behavioural observations, demonstrating the protocol’s feasibility in routine operations. AWM integrates data entry with visual documentation, such as photographs of enclosures or enrichment, which add context, enhance decision-making, and strengthen long-term records. While refinements such as group-level assessment remain, AWM offers a scalable, flexible tool combining scientific rigour with operational applicability, supporting positive welfare outcomes across diverse zoological institutions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Romain et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94fa70916d39fea4c137https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050842
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Developing and validating a holistic welfare assessment tool for zoo-housed great apes: Integrating resource-based measures with behavioural ecology insights2026
  2. 2Voluntary Additional Welfare Monitoring of Farm Animals Used in Research: Maximising Benefits Requires Sustained Support2025
  3. 3Dolphin-WET—Development of a Welfare Evaluation Tool for Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) under Human Care2024 · 15 citations
  4. 4Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Assessing Cat Welfare: A Literature Review on Behavioural, Physiological and Health Parameters with a Focus on Animal-Assisted Services (AAS)2026