PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Hydro–Meteorological Coupled Runoff Forecasting Using Multi-Model Precipitation Forecasts

View Full Paper
ZZZhanyun ZhuYZYue ZhouXZXinhua Zhao

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of multi-model precipitation forecasts in enhancing runoff forecasting accuracy.
  • Simulated daily inflow runoff using four ensemble learning models: GBDT, XGBoost, CatBoost, and Stacking.
  • Developed two hydro-meteorological coupled models by integrating the CatBoost model with numerical weather prediction and multi-model ensemble forecasts.
  • Evaluated forecast performance for lead times up to 240 hours using correlation coefficients and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency.
  • CatBoost model achieved the highest performance with CC > 0.97 and NSE > 0.95.
  • Coupled models provided optimal forecasting skill within 96 hours, with CC > 0.80 and NSE around 0.50.
  • The OCF-coupled model was more reliable for lead times of 48-96 hours, while the EC-driven approach was better in the first 48 hours.

Abstract

Accurate runoff forecasting is essential for effective water resource management, hydropower operation, and flood risk mitigation. In this study, daily inflow runoff in the Xin’an River Basin, eastern China, was simulated using four ensemble learning models: Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), XGBoost, CatBoost, and Stacking. Among them, the CatBoost model achieved the best performance, with a correlation coefficient (CC) exceeding 0.97, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) above 0.95, and reduced RMSE and MAE compared with the currently operational hydrological model. To extend the forecast lead times, two hydro–meteorological coupled models were developed by integrating the CatBoost model with a single numerical weather prediction model (EC) and a dynamically weighted multi-model ensemble precipitation forecast system (OCF). The coupled models were evaluated for lead times up to 240 h. The forecast skill value was highest within 96 h, with CC values above 0.80 and NSE around 0.50. The OCF-coupled model demonstrated improved reliability for lead times of 48–96 h, whereas the EC-driven forecasts performed better within the first 48 h. Case studies during the 2021–2022 flood seasons confirmed that the coupled framework accurately reproduced flood evolution and peak discharge dynamics, demonstrating its practical value for medium-range runoff forecasting in humid river basins.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af950a70916d39fea4c41fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/w18050638
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper