PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Business Strategy & Development1 citations

Who Cares About the Conditions? Modern Slavery in Global Supply Chain Practises: A Transnational Agenda to Promote Decent, Inclusive and Sustainable Practises

View Full Paper
KAKingsley Kofi ArthurSASimplice A. AsonguPDPeter Darko

Key Points

  • The aim is to review modern slavery in the global supply chain and propose solutions to improve practices.
  • Review of secondary data from the Scopus database.
  • Identification of gaps in current research and practices.
  • Examination of various legal frameworks addressing modern slavery.
  • Analysis of socioeconomic challenges affecting modern slavery.
  • Development of a Modern Slavery Diffusion Model.
  • Modern slavery is exacerbated by globalization and neo-trade liberalism.
  • Legal frameworks are effective in developed nations but limited in developing countries.
  • Socioeconomic issues like poverty and unemployment perpetuate modern slavery.
  • There is inadequate financial investment in anti-slavery initiatives.
  • Poor collaboration between scholars in the global north and south hampers progress.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study provides an extensive review of modern slavery practises within the global supply chain, highlighting it as a significant human rights violation that affects both the well‐being of victims and the overall supply chain performance of organisations. Using secondary data from the Scopus database, we identify critical gaps and propose practical and theoretical approaches to mitigate modern slavery. The findings indicate that globalisation and neo‐trade liberalism exacerbate modern slavery across various forms, including forced labour, child labour, labour exploitation, human trafficking, underpaid wages, coercion and debt bondage, particularly within sectors such as agriculture, fishing, construction, apparel and fashion, mining and transportation. Furthermore, we examine the effectiveness of regional and national laws, including the UN Principles on Human Right and Business, UK Modern Slavery Act of 2015, Australia's Modern Slavery Act of 2018, the California Transparency in Supply Chain Act of 2010, the Uyghur Forced Labour Prevention Act 2021, and Franch Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law of 2017, and find that while these legislative frameworks are effective at downstream levels of supply chains in developed nations, their impact is limited upstream, particularly in developing countries hindered by weak legal systems and prevailing socioeconomic challenges such as poverty, unemployemnt, food insecurity and gender dispartities which, continue to perpetuate social injustices. Additionally, we observe a troubling trend of inadequate financial investment in anti‐slavery initiatives, coupled with poor collaboration between scholars in the global south and north, which undermines efforts to combat modern slavery, particularly in less developed regions. To address these theoretical gaps, we propose a Modern Slavery Diffusion Model, alongside practical and policy‐level implications aimed at effectively tackling modern slavery issues in global supply chain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arthur et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af952b70916d39fea4c6eahttps://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70289
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper