PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology2 citationsOpen Access

Rethinking Seawater Mo Isotope Mass‐Balance and the Sedimentary Mo Record

View Full Paper
COC. M. OstranderMVMaren Voß

Key Points

  • This research aims to reassess the relationship between seawater molybdenum (Mo) isotope ratios and the oxygenation of Earth's oceans.
  • Analyzed Mo isotope ratios in sediments from deep anoxic basins in the Baltic Sea.
  • Compared sediment characteristics between oxidizing and reducing environments.
  • Assessed rates of Mo accumulation in these sediments.
  • Baltic Sea sediments showed low Mo isotope ratios similar to well-oxygenated abyssal seafloor.
  • Mo accumulation rates were found to be three to four orders-of-magnitude faster in Baltic Sea sediments.
  • Proposes that redox-stratified conditions were common in Earth's past, influencing seawater Mo ratios.

Abstract

Abstract A lingering misconception is that seawater 98 Mo/ 95 Mo ratios should have increased more or less linearly with the oxygenation of Earth's oceans. At the root of this hypothesis is the generalization that oxidizing marine sediments have a stronger affinity for lighter‐mass Mo isotopes than their reducing counterparts. This is a gross oversimplification. Sediments from deep anoxic basins in the Baltic Sea that are affected by a metal oxide “shuttle” possess low 98 Mo/ 95 Mo ratios approaching those found on the well‐oxygenated abyssal seafloor. Rates of Mo accumulation in these Baltic Sea sediments are also three to four orders‐of‐magnitude faster. Conditions found in the redox‐stratified Baltic Sea were probably much more common at times in Earth's past, and if so would have helped drive high seawater 98 Mo/ 95 Mo ratios comparable to today even if they covered a small areal fraction of the global seafloor. This alternative model could help explain the development of high seawater 98 Mo/ 95 Mo ratios in Earth's past and has important implications for timeframes such as the Ediacaran‐Cambrian rise of animals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ostrander et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af952b70916d39fea4c7b5https://doi.org/10.1029/2025pa005313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper