PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Energy Science & Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Prediction of Pipeline Defect Depth and Classification Based on CatBoost

View Full Paper
CCCong ChenRLRui LiGJGuanwei Jia

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance defect classification and depth prediction in pipeline inspections using machine learning.
  • Evaluated performance of four machine learning models.
  • Employed synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to balance defect sample sizes.
  • Conducted defect depth prediction and classification using CatBoost and other models.
  • Achieved defect classification accuracy of 0.9730 with CatBoost.
  • Reported mean squared error of 0.0256 for defect depth prediction.
  • Prediction residual range was between -1 to 1.1 mm.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Magnetic flux leakage detection is a well‐established non‐destructive in‐line inspection for pipelines. In practical applications, the volume of inspection data is large, and manually labeling of defects is time‐consuming and inefficient. Automated processing of inspection data using machine learning methods can address these issues. This study evaluates the performance of four machine learning models in defect classification and defect depth prediction. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) is employed to increase the number of minority class samples, enhancing the model's generalization ability and thereby improving the classification accuracy for minority class defects. The prediction results showed that the Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) model had a defect classification accuracy of 0.9730, a mean squared error of 0.0256 for defect depth prediction, and a prediction residual range of −1 to 1.1 mm. The CatBoost model had the advantages of high classification accuracy, a small prediction error, and a residual range. The study results provided a reference for predicting pipeline defect types and defect depths using machine learning models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af953870916d39fea4c8bahttps://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70486
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper