PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Pediatric Investigation0 citationsOpen Access

Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory in Chinese children aged 8–11 years

View Full Paper
HXHui XuLHLingying HuangLLLianjingyi Liang

Key Points

  • This study aims to translate the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory for Chinese children and evaluate its psychometric properties.
  • Translation of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory into Chinese
  • Assessment conducted with mothers of 1028 Chinese children aged 8-11 years
  • Validity tested using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
  • Evaluation of psychometric properties through Cronbach's alpha, factor analysis, and item response theory.
  • Chinese CABI scores showed excellent internal consistency.
  • The proposed 11-factor model fit the data well with a comparative fit index of 0.980.
  • CABI scores demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity with similar scales on the CBCL and SDQ.
  • CABI effectively identified children with clinical-level problems, indicating robust criterion validity.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Importance The Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) is a comprehensive assessment tool for youth psychopathology; however, its psychometric properties have not been established in China. Objective This study aimed to translate the CABI into Chinese and conduct a thorough evaluation of its reliability and validity in a sample of school‐aged Chinese children. Methods Mothers of 1028 Chinese children (53.3% boys; aged 8–11 years) completed the Chinese version of the CABI. A subsample also completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for validity testing. Psychometric properties were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, exploratory confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analyses, and item response theory (IRT). Results The Chinese CABI scores demonstrated excellent internal consistency. The proposed 11‐factor model showed a good fit to the data (comparative fit index = 0.980, root‐mean‐square error of approximation = 0.034, standardized root mean square residual = 0.047), supporting its structural validity. The scale scores exhibited strong convergent and discriminant validity, with scores correlating strongly with conceptually similar scales on the CBCL and the SDQ. Moreover, the CABI scores demonstrated robust criterion validity by effectively differentiating children with clinical‐level problems identified by the CBCL. IRT analyses confirmed that the scale scores provided high measurement precision for moderate‐to‐high trait levels, supporting their utility for clinical screening. Most of the positive properties mentioned above were consistent between boys and girls. Interpretation The CABI scale scores on the Chinese parent version showed excellent reliability and validity in Chinese children. Thus, it yields a precise instrument for the assessment of emotional, behavioral, and functional problems in clinical practice and epidemiologic research among Chinese children.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af953870916d39fea4c910https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.70049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper