PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics0 citationsOpen Access

Subnational Border Reforms and Economic Activity in Africa

View Full Paper
SBSebastian BlesseSBSebastian Blesse

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how subnational border reforms affect economic activity across various African territories.
  • Utilized GIS methods to identify affected territories in Africa from 1992 to 2013.
  • Conducted descriptive statistics to analyze population and ethnic diversity in reformed areas.
  • Performed grid-level estimations to assess associations between border reforms and local economic activity.
  • Analyzed country-level heterogeneity to understand variations across 17 African nations.
  • Identified a positive association between border reforms and local economic activity overall.
  • Revealed negative associations in six specific countries, with the removal of Ethiopia reducing the overall positive estimate.
  • Found that border reforms for administrative reasons positively impacted economic activity, while ethnic politics-driven reforms had no measurable effect.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using GIS methods, we identify territories in Africa affected by subnational border reforms between 1992 and 2013. Descriptive statistics reveal that these territories differed from other African regions across several key dimensions. For example, these territories were more populous and exhibited greater ethnic diversity. We then examine the association between subnational border reforms and economic activity across 17 African countries. Grid‐level estimations indicate a positive association between border reforms and local economic activity. However, allowing for country‐level heterogeneity reveals that border reforms are negatively associated with local economic activity in six countries. Excluding Ethiopia from the sample substantially reduces the magnitude of the overall positive estimate. A systematic examination of heterogeneity reveals that border reforms implemented for administrative purposes are positively associated with economic activity, while those driven by ethnic politics have no effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blesse et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af954870916d39fea4cadehttps://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70052
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper