PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery0 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Endoscopy, Histology, and Radiology Applications

View Full Paper
SPSameena PathanASAlen ShahiniMSMassimo Salvi

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases through various imaging modalities.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 76 high-quality studies from 2016 to 2024.
  • Analyzed applications of AI in endoscopy, histology, and radiology for GI disease diagnosis.
  • Assessed the performance of deep learning compared to traditional machine learning techniques.
  • Endoscopy emerged as the most commonly used modality for detecting GI abnormalities.
  • Deep learning methods achieved diagnostic accuracy between 90% and 99% across multiple disease categories.
  • Identified significant barriers to clinical implementation, such as a lack of multicenter validation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases remain among the leading causes of global mortality, with early detection directly linked to survival outcomes. While previous reviews have focused on single imaging modalities, this systematic review uniquely examines artificial intelligence applications across endoscopic, radiological, and histological approaches, reflecting actual clinical diagnostic pathways. This systematic review analyzes 76 high‐quality studies (2016–2024) and provides the first comprehensive assessment of how AI performs across different imaging techniques for GI abnormality detection. This multi‐modal perspective is particularly timely as healthcare systems move toward integrated diagnostic workflows. Our analysis reveals endoscopy as the most widely used modality ( n = 44), particularly for Helicobacter pylori , colorectal polyps, and ulcerative colitis detection. Histological analysis emerges as the second most common approach ( n = 25), especially for celiac disease and ulcerative colitis, while CT imaging ( n = 10) primarily supports colorectal polyp detection. Deep learning methods significantly outnumber traditional machine learning techniques (68 vs. 8 studies), consistently achieving 90%–99% diagnostic accuracy across multiple disease categories. However, these systems face significant implementation barriers to clinical adoption. Most validation is still conducted in controlled, single‐center settings using curated datasets that poorly reflect clinical complexity. Future studies must prioritize multicenter validation, standardized imaging protocols and preprocessing pipelines, and the integration of interpretable AI models capable of providing transparent diagnostic rationale. This review maps the current technical landscape while highlighting critical translational challenges that must be addressed to enable real‐world impact. This article is categorized under: Technologies > Data Preprocessing Technologies > Artificial Intelligence

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pathan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af954870916d39fea4cb2bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70074
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper