PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Energy Science & Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Maximizing Energy Generation in Agrivoltaic Systems: A Study of Bifacial and Monofacial Modules With Consideration of Module Height and Albedo Impact

View Full Paper
HDHasan DemirACAtıl Emre CoşgunMEMustafa Sacid Endiz

Key Points

  • This research assesses the impact of bifacial and monofacial PV module configurations on energy generation in agrivoltaic systems.
  • Utilized PVsyst simulations to evaluate performance under varying configurations.
  • Measured albedo data from a wheat field for realistic modeling.
  • Compared bifacial and monofacial modules at heights of 4 m and 5 m.
  • Bifacial modules generated 19.46% more energy compared to monofacial modules.
  • The height difference from installation at 4 m to 5 m led to only a marginal annual gain of 380 kWh.
  • Aligning module azimuth to field orientation caused a 5.3% loss in global radiation.

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the performance of bifacial and monofacial photovoltaic (PV) modules in agrivoltaic systems (AV) using PVsyst simulations, addressing the challenge of balancing agricultural productivity with PV yield. Its novelty lies in integrating field‐measured, monthly albedo data from a wheat field into system modelling and analyzing the specific influence of module height on bifacial performance. The methodology includes albedo measurements, AV design, and comparative simulations of monofacial and bifacial modules at 4 m (AV1) and 5 m (AV2) installation heights. Results indicate that bifacial modules produce 19.46% more energy than monofacial modules, and the height difference between AV1 and AV2 yields only a marginal annual gain of 380 kWh. Aligning module azimuth to the field orientation (−44°) minimizes agricultural disruption but causes a 5.3% loss in global radiation, illustrating operational trade‐offs. A layout of five module rows spaced 10 m apart prevents shading overlap, yielding a low shading factor (0.016). Overall, the simulations demonstrate that realistic albedo integration can enhance bifacial output by up to 19.48%, while also revealing the occasional incompatibility between maximizing PV generation and maintaining agricultural functionality in AVs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Demir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af955970916d39fea4cdc9https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70443
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper