PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Geography Compass0 citationsOpen Access

Enduring Crises of the Nation‐State: How Spatial Imaginations Reshape Identity and Dis/Unity

View Full Paper
EBErdem BekaroğluSYSuat Yazan

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the complexities of the nation-state crisis influenced by spatial misalignments and identity transformations.
  • Synthesizes globalization studies, identity literature, and spatial theory.
  • Analyzes Türkiye's historical and contemporary geopolitical changes.
  • Develops the concept of layered citizenship and spatial commoning.
  • Identifies the tension between unitary national imaginings and diverse social realities.
  • Suggests that internal cohesion relies on integrating plural identities into public discourse.
  • Proposes commons-oriented policies to enhance cultural visibility and public commonality.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reframes the contemporary “crisis” of the nation‐state not as a simple erosion of sovereignty but as a problem of spatial misalignment: adaptive states remain strategically embedded in dense transnational regimes, yet domestic legitimacy falters when unitary national imaginaries confront heterogeneous, multi‐sited social realities. Synthesizing globalization studies, identity transformation literature, and spatial theory, we conceptualize layered citizenship as a regime of constitutional equality coupled with differentiated access to political voice, cultural expression, and mobility, sustained by hierarchies of cultural legibility and securitized forms of visibility. We develop this argument through Türkiye's trajectory from late Ottoman plural imaginaries and Republican homogenization to contemporary geopolitical upscaling, showing how shifting spatial projects have configured unity and disunity across time. While external organizations recalibrate state functions without abolishing capacity, internal cohesion increasingly depends on integrating plural identities into the language and infrastructures of public space. As a constructive response, we reconstruct Blue Anatolianism not as historical romanticism but as a methodology of spatial commoning that relocates identity from blood to place and from essence to shared use. Through route pedagogy, in situ learning, multilingual signage, and conservation–use balances, we outline scalable commons‐oriented policies that render difference co‐present and publicly legible without undermining territorial integrity. The framework explains why conventional appeals to unity reproduce fragmentation and offers an implementable program to reconcile adaptive statehood with plural belongings. Though grounded in Türkiye, the argument travels to post‐imperial and metropolitan contexts, where spatial commons can realign sovereignty, territory, and identity by thickening shared infrastructures of narrative, route, use, and care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bekaroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af956970916d39fea4ce9chttps://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.70066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper