PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Advanced Intelligent Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Deep Learning Approaches for Classifying Crack States With Overload and Predicting Fatigue Parameters in a Titanium Alloy

View Full Paper
SCSeon Du ChoiSTSuman TimilsinaYSYoun Woo Shin

Key Points

  • The aim is to utilize deep learning methods to classify crack states and predict fatigue parameters in titanium alloys under overload conditions.
  • Applied deep learning using VGGNet16 and ResNet50 for classification and regression tasks.
  • Used digital image correlation to measure crack-tip strain fields during successive load cycles.
  • Classified crack states into normal, overload, and recovery with high accuracy.
  • Achieved 99.4% classification accuracy for crack states using CNNs.
  • VGGNet16 and ResNet50 reached R2 values of 0.96 and 0.89 for ΔK prediction.
  • Achieved R2 values of 0.92 and 0.91 for d a /d N prediction, demonstrating strong predictive performance.

Abstract

Crack retardation, commonly observed in metals under overload, helps extend fatigue life. Conventional methods for modeling behavior under variable loading are labor‐intensive and sensitive to measurement errors because they rely on cycle‐by‐cycle crack length measurements, plastic zone estimation, and stress intensity factor range (Δ K ) calculations. In this study, a deep learning approach based on crack‐tip strain fields, measured via digital image correlation, is proposed to evaluate overload effects on fatigue parameters, such as Δ K and fatigue crack growth rate (d a /d N ). For each data point, strain fields from successive load cycles are stacked to capture the evolution of crack‐tip behavior while reducing random noise. VGGNet16 and ResNet50 are used for classification and regression tasks. The classification task distinguishes three states: normal, overload, and recovery. Both convolutional neural networks (CNNs) achieve 99.4% accuracy in classification; VGGNet16 and ResNet50 achieve R 2 values of 0.96 and 0.89, respectively, for Δ K prediction and 0.92 and 0.91, respectively, for d a /d N prediction. The total evaluation time is on the order of seconds per data point, compared with hours for Wheeler/Elber analyses and days for finite element analysis. These results demonstrate the feasibility of CNNs in identifying overload‐induced crack states and predicting fatigue parameters directly from strain fields.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af956970916d39fea4cf41https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202501059
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fatigue Crack Length Estimation Using Acoustic Emissions Technique-Based Convolutional Neural Networks2026
  2. 2Fatigue Crack Length Estimation Using Acoustic Emissions Technique-Based Convolutional Neural Networks2026
  3. 3Study of fatigue crack propagation on modified CT specimens under variable amplitude loadings using machine learning2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Convolutional Neural Network Based Image Recognition for Crack Severity Detection and Service Life Assessment of Dissimilar Metal Welded Joints2026
  5. 5Non-planar crack propagation prediction under mixed-mode fatigue in steel jacket structures using machine learning2026 · 4 citations