PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education0 citationsOpen Access

A dynamic bidirectional system of perceived teacher boredom, language learners’ boredom, and L2 writing motivation: a feedback loop system

MSMehdi SolhiMSMajid Elahi ShirvanTTTahereh Taherian

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the dynamic interactions among perceived teacher boredom, language learners' boredom, and L2 writing motivation over time.
  • Analyzed data from 264 English as a foreign language learners and 21 teachers using a 10-day experience sampling approach.
  • Examined three feedback loops: PTB-FLB, FLB-WM, and PTB-WM.
  • Utilized dynamic structural equation modeling to evaluate relationships between variables.
  • Identified significant positive feedback effects between perceived teacher boredom and language learning boredom.
  • Uncovered a mutual reinforcement between foreign language learning boredom and L2 writing motivation.
  • Found that higher perceived teacher boredom leads to lower subsequent L2 writing motivation.

Abstract

Abstract The dynamic and reciprocal nature of boredom and motivation in L2 classrooms remains underexplored and little is known about how L2 teachers’ perceived boredom (PTB), foreign language learning boredom (FLB), and L2 writing motivation (WM) evolve within and across individuals over time, particularly from a dynamic systems perspective. A total of 264 English as a foreign language (EFL) learners and 21 teachers participated, and data were collected using a 10-day experience sampling approach. We specifically examined three feedback loops—PTB-FLB, FLB-WM, and PTB-WM. Dynamic structural equation modeling revealed significant positive cross-lagged and feedback effects between the variables, supporting self-perpetuating PTB-FLB and FLB-WM feedback loops which mutually reinforce each other in the same and opposite directions, respectively. Results also indicated a negative unidirectional loop between PTB and WM, revealing that higher PTB decreases subsequent WM. However, the non-significant WM-PTB suggests WM does not predict subsequent PTB. Thus, unlike the PTB-FLB and FLB-WM loops, the PTB-WM interaction does not form a reciprocal feedback loop. The study concludes with pedagogical recommendations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Solhi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af956970916d39fea4cf63https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-026-00388-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper