PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research0 citations

Partial Fish Meal Replacement Coupled With Protein Restriction Reduces Protein and Fish Meal Usage Without Compromising Shrimp ( Penaeus Vannamei ) Growth and Health

View Full Paper
RDRoghayeh DehghaniESEbrahim SotoudehHOHossein Ouraji

Key Points

  • To investigate the effects of protein restriction and fish meal replacement on shrimp growth and health.
  • Tested various levels of fish meal replacement (0%, 33%, 66%) with protein restriction.
  • Used a diet of yellow mealworm, spirulina, and rice concentrate in a 4:1:4.5 ratio.
  • Conducted the experiment over 56 days using six treatments with three replicates each.
  • 33% fish meal replacement with protein restriction did not impair shrimp growth or health.
  • 66% fish meal substitution resulted in reduced growth and compromised health parameters.
  • Combined approach improved feed efficiency and immune system parameters.

Abstract

Protein restriction and fish meal (FM) replacement are crucial for the sustainability of aquaculture. The effects of protein restriction (1 day feeding with dietary 40% protein and followed by 2 days feeding with dietary 35% protein, and using this cycle for 56 days) and FM replacement with an alternative protein mixture (yellow mealworm, spirulina, and rice concentrate; 4:1:4.5 ratio) on growth, body composition, hemolymph parameters, digestive enzymes, serological enzymes, immune and antioxidant system, and relative genes expressions in whiteleg shrimp ( Penaeus vannamei ) (0.63 ± 0.04 g) were tested. The levels of 0%, 33%, and 66% FM replacement (Control includes 25.5% FM, 40% protein, and 9% lipid) with and without protein restriction were adjusted (six treatments and three replicates per group) for 56 days. Applying protein restriction and 33% FM replacement simultaneously without impairment of weight gain, feed efficiency, immune and antioxidant parameters, and serological enzymes was possible. However, 66% FM substitution is excessive and resulted in reduced growth, body protein, digestive enzymes, immune and antioxidant system parameters, and serological enzymes. In conclusion, applying protein restriction along with 33% FM replacement is recommended for whiteleg shrimp farming.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dehghani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af957570916d39fea4d1bfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/nzm2.70019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper