PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management0 citations

Examining the Direct and Configurational Pathways of Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Learning Toward Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Dynamic Contexts

View Full Paper
EDEwurabena Aniniwa DarkwahUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaGCGuangyu ChenUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaEOEvans Opoku‐MensahChengdu University of Information Technology

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the pathways through which corporate social responsibility (CSR) and organizational learning lead to sustainable competitive advantage.
  • Utilized fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
  • Analyzed data from 515 professionals in mining firms in Ghana
  • Examined both direct and indirect effects of CSR on competitive advantage through different learning types
  • Identified the influence of environmental dynamism on these relationships
  • CSR positively influences sustainable competitive advantage through both exploratory and exploitative learning.
  • Exploratory learning has a stronger effect compared to exploitative learning.
  • Multiple configurations of CSR, organizational learning, and environmental dynamism lead to high competitive advantage.
  • The study highlights hsQCA as a novel approach to understanding complex relationships in CSR and learning.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amid increasing environmental and stakeholder pressures, organizations are challenged to transform corporate social responsibility into a sustainable competitive advantage. While prior studies have explored this relationship primarily through linear models, limited attention has been given to the configurational pathways through which CSR and related learning processes yield sustainable outcomes. This study addresses this gap by integrating fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) to capture both linear and configurational effects. Using data from 515 professionals across small‐ and large‐scale mining firms in Ghana, the study examines how CSR directly and indirectly influences sustainable competitive advantage through exploratory and exploitative learning, and how environmental dynamism conditions these relationships. The results reveal that CSR promotes sustainable advantage through dual learning mechanisms, with exploratory learning exerting a stronger effect. Moreover, fsQCA uncovers multiple equifinal configurations of CSR, organizational learning, and environmental dynamism that jointly lead to a high level of competitive advantage. The findings extend CSR and sustainable development research by highlighting fsQCA as a novel analytical lens for uncovering complex causal interactions and offering practical insights for firms seeking adaptive, socially responsible strategies in dynamic contexts. Theoretically, the study advances CSR and learning research by identifying distinct mechanisms and boundary conditions. In practice, it offers evidence‐based guidance to firms in volatile contexts on transforming CSR investments into adaptive capabilities that sustain long‐term competitiveness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Darkwah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af958570916d39fea4d265https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70495
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst for governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability in resource-dependent contexts2026
  2. 2Effects of corporate social responsibility on sustained competitive advantage: a moderated mediation model2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3The Interplay of Corporate Social Responsibility, Innovation Capability, Organizational Learning, and Sustainable Value Creation: Does Stakeholder Engagement Matter?2024 · 75 citations
  4. 4Circular economy orientation from corporate social responsibility: A view based on structural equation modeling and a fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility in the Context of Green Dynamic Capabilities, Responsible Innovation, and Environmental Strategy to Attain Business Excellence2026