PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Journal of Sensory Studies0 citations

The Effect of Tactile Experience on Preferences and Willingness to Pay: A Case Study of Alligator Hide

View Full Paper
JYJuyoung YooLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterDHDaniel K. HarrisLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterJPJerrod PennLouisiana State University Agricultural Center

Key Points

  • This study aims to measure how tactile experience affects consumer preferences and their willingness to pay for leather products, particularly alligator hide.
  • Conducted a discrete choice experiment with 145 responses from craft events.
  • Implemented a split-sample experiment between a control group and a tactile group.
  • Analyzed perception of quality and willingness to pay for different leather products.
  • Tactile experience increased perceived quality and willingness to pay for alligator hide products.
  • Significant variation in willingness to pay was noted, with alligator hide values ranging from $49 to $122.
  • Hypothetical bias adjustments showed diminished differences in preferences based on tactile experience.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multiple studies have experimentally investigated the influence of tactile attributes on consumer perception and preferences. Focusing on craft kits (earrings, luggage tag, and keychain) made from different types of leather including alligator and cowhide, this study is one of the first to measure the effect of tactile experience on consumer perception and willingness to pay (WTP) for a textile product. The analysis utilizes a Discrete Choice Experiment. Responses (n = 145) were gathered from 12 events geared toward crafters. We implement a split‐sample experiment where respondents to either the control group or tactile group had an opportunity to physically touch kits. Tactile experience increases perception of quality (overall, workability, desirability) and WTP for alligator hide (49–122) and beginner (−17 to 6), though others (production method, location, scale size) are unchanged. After applying a certainty‐adjustment to control for potential hypothetical bias, WTP is insignificant, and evidence of differences in preference with or without tactile experience diminishes. While we still observe an effect of tactile experience (marginal effects for beginner), it varies considerably with the particular product characteristic and may be more muted than previously shown, though more case studies are needed. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for hypothetical bias when evaluating sensory interventions, and suggest that tactile marketing may nonetheless be effective in enhancing consumer perception and demand.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af959570916d39fea4d3d6https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.70111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper