PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026The Journal of Law Economics and Organization0 citations

State ownership biases government support—evidence from the financial crisis

View Full Paper
KSKlaus M. SchmidtLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenETElena Ashtari TaftiLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenCMClarissa MangLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine if governments favor firms they own over those they do not during crises.
  • Utilized an instrumental variable approach
  • Examined allocation of stimulus funds to hospitals in Germany
  • Analyzed historical persistence of hospital ownership
  • Publicly owned hospitals received substantial preferential treatment
  • Evidence supports the existence of soft budget constraints for public enterprises
  • Stimulus allocation favors state-owned hospitals over comparable private ones

Abstract

Abstract Do governments treat firms they own more generously than comparable firms they do not own? The allocation of stimulus funds to hospitals in Germany during the financial crisis provides a unique opportunity to address this question. Using an instrumental variable approach leveraging the historical persistence of hospital ownership, we find evidence that publicly owned hospitals received substantial preferential treatment from the government. These findings have important implications for industrial policy, providing an explanation for the existence of soft budget constraints often associated with publicly owned enterprises (JEL I18, L33, L53)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schmidt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af959570916d39fea4d4f6https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewag013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper