PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Performance comparison of pressure swing adsorption and amine‐based absorption for synthesis gas purification

View Full Paper
MSMagno Fonseca SantosABAntônio E. BrescianiRARita Maria Brito Alves

Key Points

  • To evaluate and compare the separation performance of pressure swing adsorption and amine-based absorption processes for syngas purification.
  • Simulated separation processes using Aspen Plus® v10 and Aspen Adsorption® v10 software.
  • Conducted multi-criteria assessment (GREENSCOPE) focusing on efficiency, energy, environment, and economics.
  • Evaluated performance metrics including syngas purity, energy intensity, and global warming potential.
  • PSA process achieved 83.91% syngas purity with lower energy intensity than ABS.
  • ABS process achieved 97.21% syngas purity but had higher energy intensity and global warming potential.
  • PSA showed superior performance in terms of global warming potential and minimum selling price.

Abstract

Abstract This research focuses on the simulation, evaluation and comparison of the separation performance of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and amine‐based absorption (ABS) processes in synthesis gas (syngas) /carbon dioxide (CO 2) separation. The main objective of this work is to produce a syngas stream with purity and composition suitable for feeding a Fischer–Tropsch reactor for synthetic fuel production. Simulations were conducted using Aspen Plus® v10 and Aspen Adsorption® v10 software. Evaluation involves multi‐criteria assessment (GREENSCOPE) within the Brazilian context. This assessment considers four scores: efficiency (syngas purity), energy (energy intensity), environment (global warming potential), and economics (minimum selling price of synthesis gas). The PSA process achieves 83. 91% syngas purity, 0. 30 MJ/kg syngas energy intensity, 0. 004 kg CO 2‐eq /kg syngas global warming potential, and 0. 06 US/kg syngas minimum selling price. Conversely, the ABS process achieves 97. 21% syngas purity, 15. 31 MJ/kg syngas energy intensity, 0. 487 kg CO 2‐eq/ kg syngas global warming potential, and 0. 33 US/kg syngas minimum selling price. The PSA process shows superior performance across all scores, except for efficiency, which shows similar scores for both processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95cf70916d39fea4dc39https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.70320
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper