PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026World Journal of Surgery0 citations

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Severely Injured Older Adults: Comparison Between the United States and Japan

View Full Paper
KTKyosuke TakahashiKYKazuma YamakawaYTY Tanaka

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the clinical outcomes of severely injured older trauma patients between the United States and Japan.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) from 2017 to 2021.
  • Included patients aged 60 years and older with an injury severity score greater than 15.
  • Excluded patients who were dead on arrival and those with missing outcome data.
  • The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the NTDB at 14.4% compared to 10.5% in the JTDB (p < 0.001).
  • Median hospital length of stay was longer in the JTDB (22 days) than in the NTDB (7 days, p < 0.001).
  • A higher proportion of patients in the JTDB had prolonged stays exceeding 50 days (16.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001).
  • In the 60–69 age group, 36.0% were discharged home in the JTDB compared to 46.7% in the NTDB (p < 0.001).
  • Older patients (80–89 age group) had significantly lower rates of discharge to home in both datasets (p < 0.001).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Various differences in the healthcare system have been described between the United States (US) and Japan; however, the impact on clinical outcomes, particularly in severely injured older trauma patients, is not fully understood. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of severely injured older trauma patients between the US and Japan using a nationwide trauma database in each country. Methods This is a retrospective study using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) from 2017 to 2021. The two datasets were queried for patients aged ≥ 60 years with severe injuries (injury severity score > 15). We excluded patients who were dead on arrival (DOA) and had missing outcome data. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (HLOS) and disposition after hospital discharge. Results A total of 268,013 NTDB and 29,998 JTDB patients were included for the analysis. The overall in‐hospital mortality rate in the NTDB was significantly higher compared to the JTDB (14.4% vs. 10.5% p < 0.001). The median hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the JTDB than the NTDB (22 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). The rate of prolonged hospital stay, exceeding 50 days, was significantly higher in the JTDB (16.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). In the 60–69 age group, there was a significant difference in the proportion of patients that were discharged home between the JTDB and NTDB (36.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001). In both datasets, the proportions of patients discharged to home in the 80–89 age group were significantly lower compared to those in younger age groups ( p < 0.001, respectively) with more patients transferred to another hospital in the JTDB and more discharged to hospice or other facilities in the NTDB. Conclusions The results in this study suggest that there are significant outcome differences in severely injured older trauma patients between the US and Japan. Future research is warranted to identify underlying mechanisms of the outcome differences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takahashi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95de70916d39fea4ddb4https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70314
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper