PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Structural Concrete0 citationsOpen Access

Explainable artificial intelligence ( XAI )‐powered design framework for lightweight strain‐hardening ultra‐high‐performance composites ( SH ‐ UHPC )

View Full Paper
MKMetin KatlavKTKâzim Türk

Key Points

  • The aim is to predict the compressive strength of lightweight strain-hardening ultra-high-performance composites using advanced modeling techniques.
  • Utilized grey wolf optimization integrated with machine learning for compressive strength prediction.
  • Developed various GWO-ML models, with a focus on GWO-Extra Trees Regressor.
  • Employed SHapley Additive exPlanations for feature importance analysis.
  • Created an interactive graphical user interface for wider application.
  • The GWO-ETR model outperformed others with RMSE of 6.99 and R² of 0.929.
  • All models maintained a 10% margin of error during testing.
  • Provided actionable insights for engineers through feature importance analyses.

Abstract

Abstract Lightweight strain‐hardening ultra‐high‐performance concrete composite (SH‐UHPC) is an outstanding alternative for engineering applications and infrastructure thanks to its outstanding strength, toughness, ductility, and low density. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI)‐based modeling strategies into engineering problems can substantially accelerate material design processes while reducing experimental costs and time. Within this scope, the main motivation of this study is to predict the compressive strength (CS) of lightweight SH‐UHPC via a grey wolf optimization (GWO)‐integrated machine learning (ML)‐based modeling that offers high accuracy and reliability, thereby reducing experimental cost and time requirements while supporting environmental and economic sustainability. The overall results demonstrate that all developed GWO‐ML models achieved impressive performance levels in predicting the CS of lightweight SH‐UHPC. In particular, the GWO‐Extra Trees Regressor (GWO‐ETR) model demonstrated superior performance compared to other GWO‐ML models in terms of performance metrics (RMSE = 6.99, MAPE = 3.25%, and R 2 = 0.929), scatter plots (all points remained within a 10% margin of error), and uncertainty analysis ( U 95 = 10.0) during the testing phase. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanations‐based feature importance analysis, as well as individual conditional expectation analysis and partial dependence plots, provided valuable insights and design suggestions for engineers and practitioners. Finally, an interactive graphical user interface has been developed to enable the application of similar data‐driven analyses on a larger scale and to obtain rapid predictions; however, it is suggested that the database be continuously updated to improve model performance and extend its generalization capacity in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Katlav et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95de70916d39fea4de70https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70541
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper