PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Implementing the recovery approach in mental health: progress made, challenges faced, and future directions

DODonal O’KeeffeGJGerald JordanCSCalvin Swords

Key Points

  • To explore the evolution and implementation of the recovery approach in mental health, addressing both its progress and challenges.
  • Reviewed historical and contemporary literature on recovery in mental health.
  • Analyzed advancements and challenges in peer support and coproduction.
  • Discussed various contributions addressing systemic issues and tensions in implementation.
  • Identified significant progress in peer support and Recovery Colleges.
  • Highlighted challenges including tokenism, professionalisation, and systemic resistance.
  • Outlined the importance of integrating lived experience into mental health systems for reform.

Abstract

This Editorial introduces the Special Issue of the Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine focused on the evolution, implementation, and critique of the recovery approach in mental health. Tracing its roots to the 19th-century writings of John Perceval, a pioneer in lived experience advocacy, we outline how the recovery approach has grown into a global movement grounded in human rights, agency, and systemic transformation. We define the recovery approach and outline its values of shared humanity, justice, equality, respect, and compassion. We then discuss both the global progress made (including advances in peer support, Recovery Colleges, and coproduction in research, policy, and service development) and the significant challenges faced (ranging from tokenism and epistemic inequality to professionalisation and systemic resistance). The Editorial also explores tensions such as 'neorecovery', clinician uncertainty, and the co-optation of lived experience roles. We then provide a brief overview of the diverse contributions that comprise the Special Issue. Rather than romanticising the potential of lived experience integration, or celebrating marginal successes, we argue that, as a whole, this scholarly body of work illuminates pathways to mental health system reform and transformative change. These contributions help us inch closer to the promised revolution, a mental health system that has its foundations in equally valued clinical expertise, scientific rigour, and lived experience knowledge. Such a system would assist people that encounter psychological distress and mental illness, in all its forms, to not only heal but overcome, transcend, and flourish beyond suffering.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

O’Keeffe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2580996eeacc4fcec7419https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2026.10186
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical Ceiling: Barriers to Lived Experience‐Led Approaches in the Mental Health Sector2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Advance healthcare directives – their importance within Irish health services: the lived experience perspective of a service user, advocate, and campaigner2025 · 3 citations
  3. 3Facilitators of and barriers to patient and public involvement in mental health research within university settings: a systematic review and meta-synthesis2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Self- and Other-Dehumanization Processes in Health-Related Contexts: A Critical Review of the Literature2019 · 36 citations
  5. 5Risk management in the era of recovery and rights2020 · 3 citations