PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating Biventricular Diastolic Function Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 4D-Flow Derived E/e’

View Full Paper
LGLeonard GrobJSJacopo SoldiniSKStephanie Keser

Key Result

4D-E/e′ identified abnormal left ventricular diastolic function in 71% and right ventricular in 61% of patients without prior diastolic assessment.

Key Points

  • This study investigates the effectiveness of 4D-CMR-derived E/e′ in assessing biventricular diastolic function and establishing detection cutoffs for diastolic dysfunction (DD).
  • Utilized 4D flow CMR to quantify diastolic transvalvular flow in 132 individuals (75 controls and 57 patients).
  • Assessed tissue velocity via mitral/tricuspid annular velocity and strain metrics.
  • Compared 4D-E/e′ results with echocardiography to derive cutoffs for DD detection.
  • 4D-E/e′ was significantly higher in patients with cardiovascular disease compared to controls (p<0.05).
  • Annular velocity was most effective in distinguishing patients with echocardiography-confirmed DD (AUC=0.90 for left heart; AUC=0.81 for right heart, both p<0.01).
  • 71% of patients without an assessment were found to have abnormal left ventricular diastolic function using 4D-E/e’ thresholds.

Structured PICO

Does 4D-CMR-derived E/e' accurately evaluate biventricular diastolic function in patients with cardiovascular disease?

P
Population
132 participants, comprising 75 controls and 57 patients with cardiovascular disease.
I
Intervention
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) 4D-Flow derived E/e' (diastolic transvalvular flow quantified from 4D flow, tissue velocity assessed using cine-derived annular velocity and strain).
C
Comparator
Echocardiography (for patients with graded diastolic dysfunction) and healthy controls.
O
Outcome
Evaluation of biventricular diastolic function (ability to distinguish patients with echocardiography-confirmed diastolic dysfunction).surrogate

4D-CMR-derived E/e' is a feasible and accurate imaging biomarker for assessing biventricular diastolic function and identifying unrecognized diastolic abnormalities.

Abstract

Abstract Aims Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a key modality for characterizing heart diseases but is limited in assessing diastolic dysfunction (DD). 4D flow CMR now enables transvalvular blood flow quantification, while biventricular tissue relaxation can be quantified through annular tissue velocity and strain on standard cine images. This study investigated the utility of 4D-CMR-derived E/e′ in evaluating biventricular diastolic function. Secondary aims included comparison with echocardiography to establish 4D-E/e′ cutoffs for detecting unknown DD. Methods and Results Diastolic transvalvular flow (4D-E) was quantified from 4D flow in 75 controls and 57 patients with cardiovascular disease. Tissue velocity (e′) was assessed using cine-derived mitral/tricuspid annular velocity, longitudinal strain rate (e′FT-SR), and strain velocity (e′FT-vel). Biventricular 4D-E/e′ was feasible across all e′ methods, and significantly higher in patients than controls (p0.05). The patients were split into two subgroups, one with echocardiographic graded DD to derive CMR cutoffs, and a second with unassessed diastolic function. 4D-E/e′ using annular velocity best distinguished patients with echocardiography-confirmed DD in the left (AUC=0.90±0.05, p0.01) and right heart (AUC=0.81±0.07, p0.01). Among patients without a diastolic assessment, 71% were identified with abnormal left ventricular diastolic function and 61% with abnormal right ventricular diastolic function when stratified against the lower 4D-E/e’ cutoffs. Conclusion 4D-E/e′, integrating transvalvular flow and tissue velocity, is feasible for biventricular diastolic function assessment. CMR identified previously unrecognized biventricular diastolic abnormalities in patients with cardiovascular disease, suggesting 4D-E/e′ may be a valuable tool for early detection and referral for further diastolic testing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grob et al. (2026) studied this question. 4D-E/e′ identified abnormal left ventricular diastolic function in 71% and right ventricular in 61% of patients without prior diastolic assessment.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2580996eeacc4fcec742ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyag039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper