PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Nature Communications0 citationsOpen Access

The association of physical activity with urological cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

FXFangfang XieCXChaoqu XieHYHongyu Yue

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the relationship between physical activity and the risk of urological cancer types including bladder, prostate, and renal cancers.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95 studies.
  • Analyzed data from 11,255,721 participants and 176 risk estimates.
  • Compared risk levels in individuals with different physical activity levels and analyzed subgroups by cancer type, gender, and activity type.
  • High levels of physical activity correlated with reduced urological cancer risks: 9% overall, 13% bladder, 6% prostate, and 11% renal cancer.
  • Stronger risk reduction was observed in case-control studies (14%) compared to cohort studies (7%).
  • Women experienced a greater reduction in risk (14%) than men (7%).
  • Occupational physical activity showed a higher protective effect (16%) than recreational activities (11%).

Abstract

Urological cancer (UC) is associated with significant adverse outcomes and poses a major global health burden. Although physical activity (PA) may reduce the risk of a single cancer site of UC through multiple pathways, whether PA is associated with the whole of UC is largely unknown. This study assesses the reduction in the risk of UC (including bladder, prostate, and renal cancer) associated with PA. We analyze data from 95 studies comprising 176 risk estimates based on 11,255,721 participants. Compared to low PA levels, high PA levels are associated with 9, 13, 6, and 11% lower risks of urological, bladder, prostate, and renal cancer, respectively. This association is stronger in case-control studies (14%) than cohort studies (7%), women experience a greater risk reduction (14%) than men (7%), and occupational PA is more protective than recreational PA (16% vs. 11%). This study provides comprehensive information on the inverse relationship between PA and UC risk. The evidence indicates that PA as prehabilitation may improve physical fitness and reduce UC risk, particularly for certain types of malignancies. International PA guidelines should encourage PA to reduce the risk of UC. However, the highest amount of PA is not always the best. Future studies should determine the maximum beneficial duration and frequency of PA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2580996eeacc4fcec7523https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70149-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper