PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026JBMR Plus0 citationsOpen Access

Histomorphometric Bone Analysis in Premenopausal Women with Longstanding Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoporosis

View Full Paper
MPMariana Ortega PerezLSLucas Peixoto SalesVJVanda Jorgetti

Key Points

  • The research evaluates bone microarchitecture in premenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis using histomorphometry.
  • Conducted biopsies from the iliac crest in 12 premenopausal women with RA and low bone mineral density.
  • Compared histomorphometric parameters to age- and sex-matched controls.
  • Assessed static and dynamic bone parameters.
  • Bone volume was lower in RA patients than controls.
  • Patients showed reduced trabecular thickness and increased cortical porosity.
  • Dynamic evaluation indicated lower mineralizing surface and variability in mineralization lag time.
  • Osteoid indices correlated positively with disease activity.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Data on bone microarchitecture in premenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are scarce and have not been evaluated using histomorphometry. We assessed bone fragility in premenopausal RA women through static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters, compared to age- and sex-matched controls. Methods Eighty patients were screened, and iliac crest biopsies were performed in those with fragility fractures or low BMD (Z-score ≤ −2.0). All analyses focus exclusively on the 12 women who underwent bone biopsy. Results Among these 12 premenopausal women with longstanding RA, mean age was 41.8 ± 6.6 yr and disease duration was 10.8 ± 5.8 yr. Bone volume (BV/TV) was numerically lower in RA patients compared with controls (p = .064). Thus, a reduction in bone volume cannot be excluded, given the limited statistical power. RA patients demonstrated reduced trabecular thickness, increased cortical porosity, and higher osteoclastic surface. Dynamic evaluation showed markedly lower mineralizing surface (MS/BS) and greater variability in mineralization lag time (Mlt). However, Mlt values remained within the physiological range and do not meet histological criteria for osteomalacia. Four patients (33%) showed absent tetracycline labeling. Osteoid indices correlated positively with disease activity, and MS/BS correlated inversely with glucocorticoid dose. Conclusion In this selected group of premenopausal women with longstanding RA and osteoporosis by clinical criteria, bone fragility appears to result from a combination of trabecular thinning, cortical porosity, and disturbances in mineralization kinetics rather than from classic histomorphometric osteoporosis or osteomalacia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2585696eeacc4fcec7d46https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1DXA Reporting Updates: 2023 Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry2023 · 85 citations
  2. 22010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative2010 · 4,977 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of bone mineral density, bone metabolism, osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of the NFκB ligand serum levels during treatment with infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis2006 · 244 citations
  4. 4The role of female hormonal factors in the development of rheumatoid arthritis2016 · 137 citations
  5. 5Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee1987 · 5,043 citations