PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología2 citationsOpen Access

Tidal Disruption Events with SPH-EXA : Resolving the Return of the Stream

View Full Paper
NKNoah KubliAFAlessia FranchiniECE. Coughlin

Key Points

  • This research investigates the behavior of debris streams during tidal disruption events by simulating star interactions with black holes.
  • Conducted high-resolution simulations using SPH-EXA with up to 10^10 particles.
  • Analyzed the disruption of a solar-like star by a 10^6 M⊙ black hole.
  • Examined relativistic apsidal precession effects on debris orbits and stream returning dynamics.
  • Significant in-plane spreading of the debris was observed as the stream returns through pericenter.
  • Increased simulation resolution diminished the effect of debris stream width changes.
  • Findings suggest that kinetic energy dissipation during pericenter passage is not significant, challenging previous models.

Abstract

Abstract In a tidal disruption event (TDE), a star is disrupted by the tidal field of a massive black hole, creating a debris stream that returns to the black hole, forms an accretion flow, and powers a luminous flare. Over the last few decades, several numerical studies have concluded that shock-induced dissipation occurs as the stream returns to pericenter (i.e., pre-self-intersection), resulting in efficient circularization of the debris. However, the efficacy of these shocks is the subject of intense debate. We present high-resolution simulations (up to 10 10 particles) of the disruption of a solar-like star by a 10 6 M ⊙ black hole with the new, GPU-based, smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code sph-exa , including the relativistic apsidal precession of the stellar debris orbits; our simulations run from initial disruption to the moment of stream self-intersection. With ∼10 8 particles—corresponding to the highest-resolution SPH simulations of TDEs in the preexisting literature—we find significant, in-plane spreading of the debris as the stream returns through pericenter, in line with previous works that suggested this is a significant source of dissipation and luminous emission. However, with increasing resolution, this effect is dramatically diminished, and with 10 10 particles, there is effectively no change between the incoming and the outgoing stream widths. Our results demonstrate that the paradigm of significant dissipation of kinetic energy during pericenter passage is incorrect, and instead, it is likely that debris circularization is mediated by the originally proposed stream–stream collision scenario.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kubli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2587296eeacc4fcec815dhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae4748
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper