PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026BMC Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic value of peripheral blood fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in pancreatic cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

JLJingjing LuCYCuilin YuanJPJianfeng Pan

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in pancreatic cancer patients.
  • Conducted systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio in pancreatic cancer patients.
  • Searched databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies.
  • Included six retrospective studies with overall survival and progression-free survival data.
  • High fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio is associated with worse overall survival (HR = 2.26; p < 0.001).
  • High fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio is linked to shorter progression-free survival (HR = 1.88; p < 0.001).
  • Subgroup analyses confirm the prognostic value of the ratio across different treatment methods.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy with poor prognosis, largely due to late diagnosis and limited therapeutic efficacy. Identifying accessible and reliable prognostic biomarkers is essential for individualized patient management. The fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) has emerged as a potential indicator reflecting systemic inflammation and nutritional status. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing FAR in PC patients. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to September 2025. Eligible studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled analyses, subgroup evaluations, sensitivity tests, and publication bias assessments were conducted using standard meta-analytic techniques. Six retrospective studies encompassing 1,295 patients were included. High FAR was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.73–2.96; p < 0.001) and shorter PFS (HR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.34–2.66; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the prognostic value of FAR across different treatment modalities and cut-off thresholds. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias tests supported the robustness of these findings. High FAR is a simple, cost-effective, and reproducible biomarker predicting poor survival in PC, integrating tumor-related inflammation and host nutritional status. FAR may aid in risk stratification and individualized management, though prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate its clinical utility and clarify underlying mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b258a396eeacc4fcec8870https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15840-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper