PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Loading Direction on Mechanical Behavior of Core–Shell Cu-Al Nanoparticles Under Uniform Compressive Loading-Molecular Dynamics Study

View Full Paper
PTPhillip TomichMZMichael ZawadzkiISIman Salehinia

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand how different loading directions affect the mechanical behavior of core-shell Cu-Al nanoparticles under compressive loading.
  • Employed molecular dynamics simulations to assess nanoparticle deformation.
  • Compared Cu-core/Al-shell with solid Cu, solid Al, and hollow Al shell under uniaxial loading.
  • Analyzed orientation-dependent behavior along multiple crystallographic directions.
  • Solid Cu showed strong directional behavior with transitions between dislocation slip and twinning.
  • Hollow Al shells exhibited reduced stiffness and strength, confining plasticity.
  • Core-shell nanoparticles demonstrated delayed yielding and enhanced ductility compared to solid counterparts.

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of metallic core–shell nanoparticles is critical for their use as reinforcement particles and additive manufacturing feedstocks, yet their deformation mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study employs molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the compressive response of a Cu-core/Al-shell nanoparticle and compares it with solid Cu, solid Al, and a hollow Al shell of the same size under uniaxial loading along ⟨100⟩, ⟨110⟩, ⟨111⟩, and ⟨112⟩ directions. The single-material nanoparticles show strong anisotropy: solid Cu exhibits orientation-dependent transitions from dislocation slip to deformation twinning, while introducing a void to form a hollow Al shell reduces stiffness and strength, confines plasticity to the shell wall, and suppresses extended load-bearing twins. The Cu–Al core–shell nanoparticle combines these behaviors in an orientation-dependent manner. Under ⟨110⟩ and ⟨112⟩ loading, deformation is largely shell-dominated, whereas ⟨100⟩ and ⟨111⟩ loading more strongly activates the Cu core. Mechanistically, ⟨100⟩ is characterized by Shockley partial activity and junction/lock formation in the Al shell coupled with twinning in the Cu core; ⟨110⟩ shows primarily shell partials with limited core involvement; ⟨111⟩ promotes partial-dislocation activity in both shell and core; and ⟨112⟩ produces localized, twin-dominated bands in the Al shell with shell-thickness-dependent twin extension into the Cu core. These trends are rationalized using Schmid factor considerations for 111⟨110⟩ slip and 111⟨112⟩ partial/twinning shear, together with the effects of faceted free surfaces and the Cu–Al interface. The core–shell geometry enables two concurrent interface-mediated pathways, i.e., (i) stress transfer and reduced cross-interface transmission and (ii) circumferential bypass within the shell, which together yield only slight flow-stress increases over solid Al while markedly reducing stress serrations compared with both solid Cu and solid Al. Across all orientations, the core–shell structures also exhibit delayed yielding (higher yield strain) relative to solid Cu, indicating enhanced ductility. The results provide an atomistic basis for designing Cu–Al core–shell nanoparticles for robust particle-based processing and additive manufacturing feedstock, and for informing multiscale models with mechanism-resolved, orientation-dependent inputs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tomich et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b0996eeacc4fcec95cfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16030186
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper