PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Experimental Brain Research0 citationsOpen Access

Customizing galvanic vestibular stimulation amplitude: an objective technique using sway indices to account for individual sensitivity

HTHailey A. TrierSDSamantha B. DouglasJSJorge M. Serrador

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop an objective procedure for measuring individual sensitivity levels to galvanic vestibular stimulation using postural sway metrics.
  • Used galvanic vestibular stimulation with intensities from 0.1 to 0.7 mA on participants.
  • Measured sway amplitudes using inertial motion sensors during 20-second trials.
  • Established sensitivity indices (objective and subjective) based on participants' sway responses.
  • Sensitivity indices showed strong correlation between head and torso responses.
  • Objectively measured sway indices had greater variability among subjects compared to subjective reports.
  • The method provides a way to account for individual differences in sensitivity to GVS.

Abstract

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) uses transcutaneous direct current stimulation to either improve balance function at low intensities or provide a sensory disruption at higher intensities. The present study sought to establish an objective procedure for determining individual sensitivity levels for GVS using postural sway. GVS thresholds were obtained in healthy young adults over three sessions while standing with feet together and eyes closed using sinusoidal stimuli at intensity amplitudes ranging between 0.1 and 0.7 mA. Sway amplitudes from inertial motion sensors mounted on the head and torso were derived from sinusoidal fits over each 20 s trial. Individual sensitivities were determined using amplitude indices (lowest level that induced sway greater than sway without stimulation), critical indices using logistic analysis of sway amplitudes across the entire stimulus range, and subjective indices (lowest level that subjects perceived a sense of motion). Sensitivity indices for head and torso were strongly correlated, as were the corresponding amplitude and critical indices, and indices across multiple sessions. The sensitivity indices based on sway reflected greater intersubject variability than subjective indices. We conclude that a sinusoidally evoked postural sway sensitivity index provides an objective measure that may be used to account for intersubject GVS sensitivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab2902a1e69014ccbd37https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07250-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper