PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Cryptography2 citationsOpen Access

Cryptographic Foundations of Pseudonymisation for Personal Data Protection

View Full Paper
KLKonstantinos Limniotis

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how cryptographic techniques can enhance pseudonymisation in personal data protection.
  • Present a survey of pseudonymisation mechanisms and cryptographic techniques.
  • Systematically classify approaches based on design dimensions relevant to data protection challenges.
  • Discuss recent legal developments regarding pseudonymisation, including CJEU judgments.
  • Identified various traditional and advanced cryptographic methods for pseudonymisation.
  • Classified existing approaches, highlighting key design aspects for data protection.
  • Clarified the legal interpretation of pseudonymous data under European data protection law.

Abstract

Pseudonymisation constitutes an essential technical and organisational measure for implementing personal data-protection safeguards. Its main goal is to hide identities of individuals, thus reducing data protection and privacy risks through facilitating the fulfilment of several principles such as data minimisation and security. However, selecting and deploying appropriate pseudonymisation mechanisms in a risk-based approach, tailored to the specific data processing context, remains a non-trivial task. This survey paper aims to present especially how cryptography can be used at the service of pseudonymisation, putting emphasis not only on traditional approaches but also on advanced cryptographic techniques that have been proposed to address special pseudonymisation challenges. To this end, we systematically classify existing approaches according to a taxonomy that captures key design dimensions that are relevant to specific data-protection challenges. Finally, since the notion of pseudonymisation adopted in this work is grounded in European data-protection law, we also discuss recent legal developments, in particular the CJEU’s latest judgment, which refined the interpretation of pseudonymous data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Konstantinos Limniotis (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab8002a1e69014ccc749https://doi.org/10.3390/cryptography10020018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation and utilisation of privacy enhancing technologies—A data spaces perspective2024 · 17 citations
  2. 2Blockchain Meets VANET: An Architecture for Identity and Location Privacy Protection in VANET2019 · 91 citations
  3. 3A Comprehensive Survey on Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Federated Recommendation Systems2023 · 50 citations
  4. 4Pseudonymization tools for medical research: a systematic review2025 · 12 citations
  5. 5Design and implementation of the idemix anonymous credential system2002 · 169 citations