PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026F1000Research3 citationsOpen Access

Examining types of Organizational Structure in Private Chartered Universities in Western Uganda and their Impact on Academic Staff Performance

TSTuryamureeba silajiZBZulaihatu Lawal BagiwaTMTukur Muhammad

Key Points

  • The study aims to examine different organizational structure dimensions in private universities and their effect on academic staff performance.
  • Utilized a convergent parallel mixed-methods design
  • Collected quantitative data from 186 academic staff using structured questionnaires
  • Conducted in-depth interviews with 10 academic deans for qualitative insights
  • Analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression
  • Thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data and results were merged during interpretation.
  • Identified dominant mechanistic structures with centralized decision-making and formalised procedures
  • Found a significant positive relationship between organizational structure and academic staff performance (r = 0.512, p < 0.01)
  • Organizational structure explained 26.2% of variance in performance (R² = 0.262, p < 0.001)
  • Qualitative findings indicated that excessive centralization limited academic autonomy and creativity.

Abstract

Background This study examined organisational structure dimensions in privately chartered universities in Western Uganda and how they influence academic staff performance. Guided by Administrative Management principles and interpreted through Expectancy Theory, the study explains how institutional arrangements shape staff behaviour and performance outcomes rather than testing motivational constructs directly. Method A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative data collected concurrently. Quantitative data were obtained from 186 academic staff using structured questionnaires, while qualitative insights were gathered from 10 academic deans through in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression, whereas qualitative data were analysed thematically, and the findings were merged during interpretation. Results Findings revealed dominant mechanistic structural dimensions characterised by centralised decision-making and formalised procedures. A significant positive relationship was observed between organisational structure dimensions and academic staff performance (r = 0.512, p 2 = 0.262, F(1,184) = 65.46, p

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

silaji et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab9102a1e69014ccc879https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.164151.3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of enabling and coercive bureaucracies and of perceived organizational support during the pandemic on teachers’ intention to leave the profession2023 · 6 citations
  2. 2ERRATUM2019 · 3 citations
  3. 3Combining Individual and Firm-level Human Capital Resources: The Creation and Performance Benefits of Human Capital Alignment2020 · 5 citations
  4. 4A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research2020 · 2,873 citations
  5. 5A Socioemotional Wealth Approach to CEO Career Horizons in Family Firms2015 · 198 citations