PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Development and Application of Nasal Spine-Guided Classification for Maxillary Sinus Pneumatization

View Full Paper
AKAhmed M KabliRKRawan K. KamalRMRayan M. Meer

Key Points

  • The research aims to create a classification system for maxillary sinus pneumatization and examine its relationship with the roots of posterior teeth.
  • Used cone-beam computed tomography to measure maxillary sinus pneumatization in 380 patients.
  • Measured pneumatization in horizontal planes and in edentulous areas between roots of multi-rooted teeth.
  • Evaluated maxillary sinus membrane thickness; analyzed results statistically considering a p-value < 0.05.
  • Mean maxillary sinus pneumatization was approximately 8.8 mm on the left side and 8.58 mm on the right side with no significant difference.
  • Median pneumatization varied in the edentulous area and between roots, indicating anatomical variations.
  • 80.49% of roots on the left side and 79.48% on the right side were in direct contact with the sinus floor; no significant correlation was found with membrane thickness.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a novel Nasal Spine-Guided Classification for assessing the alveolar vertical extension of the maxillary sinus and to evaluate its anatomical relationship with the roots of the posterior teeth using CBCT in a Saudi subpopulation. Methods: Maxillary sinus pneumatization was measured using cone-beam computed tomography for 380 patients. The assessment was performed along a horizontal plane extending between anterior and posterior nasal spine. In addition, pneumatization was evaluated in edentulous areas, and between the roots of multi-rooted teeth. Maxillary sinus membrane thickness was also measured. The results were expressed as mean, median and interquartile range, and considered statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05. Results: The mean maxillary sinus pneumatization on the left side was 8.8 ± 4.32 mm, and 8.58 ± 4.85 mm on the right side, with no statistically significant difference. The median of pneumatization in the edentulous area and between the roots on left side were 5.1 and 3.8 mm respectively, while on the right side, the median pneumatization was 5.03 and 3.04 mm. In addition, the proximity of the maxillary root apices to the sinus floor revealed a zero distance in 80.49% of the roots on the left side and in 79.48% on the right side. Furthermore, the results indicated no statistically significant association between maxillary sinus membrane thickness and pneumatization in the edentulous area. Conclusions: CBCT analysis revealed a predominance of advanced maxillary sinus pneumatization (Class III) and a high frequency of direct contact between posterior maxillary root apices and the sinus floor in the studied population. Additionally, no significant association was identified between maxillary sinus membrane thickness and sinus pneumatization in edentulous areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kabli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac6002a1e69014cce050https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062124
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper