PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Community Health Centre Systems in Rwanda

View Full Paper
AMAline MukamanaSHSamuel HabimanaJUJean de Dieu Uwimana

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Rwanda's community health centre system in delivering essential maternal and child health services.
  • Quasi-experimental design to estimate causal effects
  • Difference-in-differences approach using phased rollout data
  • Cost data from financial records and health outcome data from health information systems
  • Cost-effectiveness modeled using a linear regression framework
  • Enhanced CHC system associates with a 17% reduction in cost per disability-adjusted life year averted compared to standard care
  • Improvement driven by increased service utilisation for antenatal care and childhood immunisation
  • No proportional increase in total economic costs during the evaluation period

Abstract

{ "background": "Community health centres (CHCs) are a cornerstone of primary healthcare delivery in many low-resource settings, yet robust evidence on their cost-effectiveness remains limited. This gap hinders optimal resource allocation and health system planning. ", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Rwanda's CHC system in delivering a package of essential maternal and child health services, using a quasi-experimental design to estimate causal effects on health outcomes relative to costs incurred. ", "methodology": "We employed a difference-in-differences design, exploiting the phased rollout of CHC enhancements across districts. Cost data were collected from financial records, and health outcome data were extracted from district health information systems. Cost-effectiveness was modelled using a linear regression framework: CEi = \0 + \1 + \2 + \3 (\) + \, where CEᵢ is the cost per disability-adjusted life year averted in district i. Inference was based on cluster-robust standard errors. ", "findings": "The enhanced CHC system was associated with a 17% reduction in the cost per disability-adjusted life year averted compared to standard care (95% CI: 12% to 22%). This improvement was primarily driven by increased service utilisation for antenatal care and childhood immunisation, without a proportional increase in total economic costs. ", "conclusion": "The Rwandan CHC model demonstrates significant cost-effectiveness in delivering key primary healthcare services. The findings suggest that strategic investment in integrated community-level health systems can yield substantial returns in health value. ", "recommendations": "Policy makers should consider the phased enhancement of CHCs as a viable strategy for improving primary healthcare efficiency. Future research should investigate the long-term sustainability and equity impacts of this model. ", "key words": "cost-effectiveness analysis, primary healthcare, difference-in

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mukamana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac6002a1e69014cce0e3https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18950580
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper