PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Biosensors6 citationsOpen Access

Organs-on-Chips in Drug Development: Engineering Foundations, Artificial Intelligence, and Clinical Translation

View Full Paper
NRNelson RoyLCLuca Cucullo

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore advancements in organs-on-chips technologies for drug development and clinical applications.
  • Review of literature from 2010 to 2025
  • Synthesis of advances in materials, fabrication, and microfluidic design
  • Analysis of organ-focused case studies and translational benchmarks
  • Evaluation of validation approaches and regulatory developments
  • Discussion of AI and multi-omics integration for analysis
  • Organ-on-chips achieved AUROC ≥ 0.85 for torsadogenic risk classification
  • Renal chips improved predictions of drug clearance compared to standard assays
  • Progress in incorporating vascularization and immune components
  • Advancements in real-time biosensing modalities for various organ functions
  • Emergence of quantitatively benchmarked platforms for precision medicine.

Abstract

Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) technologies, also termed microphysiological systems (MPSs), integrate microfluidics, engineered biomaterials, human-derived cells, and on-chip biosensing to model human physiology in microscale devices that deliver quantitative, time-resolved readouts. This review surveys the 2010–2025 literature, emphasizing how sensing, standardized sampling, and analytics enable clinical concordance and fit-for-purpose regulatory use. We synthesize advances in (i) materials, fabrication, and microfluidic design; (ii) organ- and disease-focused case studies; and (iii) translational benchmarks that align chip outputs with clinical pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and biomarker datasets. Across organ systems, platforms increasingly incorporate vascularization, immune components, and organoid hybrids, paired with real-time measurements of barrier integrity, metabolism, electrophysiology, and secreted biomarkers using impedance (TEER), electrochemical, and optical modalities. Representative benchmarking studies report cardiac OoCs achieving AUROC ≥ 0.85 for torsadogenic risk classification, and renal chips improving prediction of transporter-mediated clearance relative to conventional in vitro assays. We summarize validation approaches and regulatory developments relevant to new approach methodologies, including the FDA Modernization Act 2.0, and discuss how AI and multi-omics can automate signal and image analysis, harmonize cross-platform datasets, and support digital-twin workflows that couple OoC measurements to in silico models. Overall, biosensor-enabled OoCs are progressing toward quantitatively benchmarked platforms for safety pharmacology, ADME/PK–PD, and precision medicine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac9002a1e69014cce58fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/bios16030155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1International Multisite Study of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Drug Proarrhythmic Potential Assessment2018 · 378 citations
  2. 2Angiogenesis and Functional Vessel Formation Induced by Interstitial Flow and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Using a Microfluidic Chip2022 · 36 citations
  3. 3Human iPSC-based Cardiac Microphysiological System For Drug Screening Applications2015 · 526 citations
  4. 4Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids2016 · 3,249 citations
  5. 5A guide to the organ-on-a-chip2022 · 1,076 citations