PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Assessment of UAV-Based TSEB and Field-Calibrated AquaCrop for Evapotranspiration on the Arid Coast of Peru

View Full Paper
RPRoxana Peña-AmaroJHJosé Huanuqueño-MurilloLRLía Ramos-Fernández

Key Points

  • This study aims to precisely estimate evapotranspiration (ET) using UAV-based TSEB and AquaCrop models in arid regions.
  • Utilized UAV thermal-multispectral imagery and AquaCrop for ET estimation.
  • Conducted 13 UAV surveys to gather data on radiometric surface temperature and biophysical inputs.
  • Established a network of 24 drainage lysimeters for independent validation of ET measurements.
  • AquaCrop showed high agreement in ET estimation with R2 = 0.85.
  • UAV-TSEB demonstrated moderate agreement with R2 = 0.66.
  • Both models exhibited consistent temporal dynamics and effective partitioning of crop transpiration and soil evaporation.

Abstract

Precise estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) is essential for sustainable water management in arid agroecosystems, particularly for high-water-demand crops such as rice. This study integrated very-high-resolution UAV thermal–multispectral imagery with a Two-Source Energy Balance model (UAV–TSEB) and a field-calibrated AquaCrop model to quantify daily ET and its components under continuous flooding on the arid Peruvian coast during the 2024–2025 season. A network of 24 drainage lysimeters provided an independent observational benchmark (ETlys); to represent the treatment-level response, lysimeter observations were aggregated as the mean across the 24 units for each UAV campaign. Thirteen UAV surveys supplied radiometric surface temperature and biophysical inputs (e.g., NDVI and fractional cover) to derive spatially explicit ET, while AquaCrop provided continuous daily simulations between flight dates. Direct lysimeter-based validation indicated high agreement for AquaCrop (R2 = 0.85; RMSE = 0.26 mm d−1; MBE = 0.01 mm d−1) and moderate agreement for UAV–TSEB (R2 = 0.66; RMSE = 0.81 mm d−1; MBE = 1.01 mm d−1). Model intercomparison further showed consistent temporal dynamics of ET (R2 = 0.70; RMSE = 1.35 mm d−1) and robust partitioning of crop transpiration (R2 = 0.79; RMSE = 0.99 mm d−1) and soil evaporation (R2 = 0.76; RMSE = 1.03 mm d−1) while revealing a systematic divergence under near-complete canopy cover: AquaCrop tended to suppress evaporation, whereas UAV–TSEB detected residual evaporation from the flooded surface. Overall, the results highlight the complementarity of both approaches—UAV–TSEB as a spatial diagnostic tool and AquaCrop as a temporally continuous simulator—providing a robust framework for ET monitoring, flux partitioning, and water-use-efficiency assessment in water-scarce rice systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peña-Amaro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3acd302a1e69014ccedc6https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060856
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Very-High-Resolution, Multi-Season Monitoring of Crop Evapotranspiration and Water Stress with UAV Data and TSEB Integration2025
  2. 2Spatiotemporal assessment of maize evapotranspiration and surface energy fluxes under varying irrigation regimes using UAV based METRIC2026
  3. 3Mapping Evapotranspiration Patterns in the Desert-Oasis Ecotone Using UAV-Based Thermal Infrared Imagery with a Three-Temperature Model2026
  4. 4Quantifying spatial variability of crop water use by combining eddy covariance observations with high-resolution UAV-based remote sensing2024
  5. 5Combining UAV remote sensing data to estimate seasonal actual evapotranspiration and surface conductance in rice paddies2026