PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Perioperative and Surgical Management of Constrictive Pericarditis

LHLamis El HarakeMAMohamed Al-KazazPCPAUL C CREMER

Key Result

Radical pericardiectomy demonstrated an operative mortality rate of 2.3%, significantly better than 27% for radiation-associated constrictive pericarditis cases.

Key Points

  • The research aims to review best practices for managing constrictive pericarditis through surgical interventions.
  • Reviewed contemporary surgical techniques for constrictive pericarditis
  • Evaluated patient selection and timing of surgical intervention
  • Assessed multimodality imaging in diagnosis and planning
  • Radical pericardiectomy shows superior recovery compared to partial resection
  • Certain cases like radiation-associated disease yield poorer outcomes
  • Patient outcomes greatly depend on etiology and risk factors like organ dysfunction

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with constrictive pericarditis, including chronic fibrotic, transient inflammatory, and effusive-constrictive phenotypes.
I
Intervention
Surgical management, specifically radical pericardiectomy, and perioperative care.

Radical pericardiectomy at high-volume centers is the definitive treatment for chronic constrictive pericarditis, requiring careful patient selection via multimodality imaging and etiology-based risk stratification.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 2.3

Limitations

  • Lack of randomized controlled trial data
  • Diagnosis and outcomes may vary significantly by etiology
  • Variability in expertise across institutions

Abstract

Constrictive pericarditis represents a form of severe diastolic heart failure characterized by impaired diastolic filling due to a rigid, noncompliant pericardium. Surgical pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment for chronic or refractory subacute constrictive pericarditis; however, outcomes vary widely depending on disease etiology, chronicity, myocardial involvement, end-organ dysfunction, and surgical technique. This review summarizes contemporary best practices for the surgical management of constrictive pericarditis, with emphasis on patient selection, timing of intervention, operative approach, and perioperative considerations. Accurate differentiation between inflammatory, transient constrictive phenotypes and irreversible fibrotic disease is central to therapeutic decision-making. Etiology-based risk stratification, assessment of hepatic and renal dysfunction, and careful evaluation of myocardial involvement provide critical prognostic information. Multimodality imaging plays a central role in diagnosis, surgical planning, and identification of patients most likely to benefit from intervention. Radical pericardiectomy is associated with superior functional recovery compared with partial resection, whereas radiation-associated disease, mixed constrictive–restrictive physiology, and advanced end-organ dysfunction are consistently linked to worse outcomes. High-volume centers of excellence in pericardial disease are critical in optimizing results after radical pericardiectomy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harake et al. (2026) conducted a review in constrictive pericarditis (n=601). radical pericardiectomy vs. partial resection was evaluated on operating mortality (OR 2.3). Radical pericardiectomy demonstrated an operative mortality rate of 2.3%, significantly better than 27% for radiation-associated constrictive pericarditis cases.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ad1302a1e69014ccf522https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1789
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Constrictive pericarditis: diagnosis, management and clinical outcomes2017 · 186 citations
  2. 2Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era2008 · 260 citations
  3. 3A Clearer View of Effusive–Constrictive Pericarditis2004 · 88 citations
  4. 4Constrictive Pericarditis in 26 Patients With Histologically Normal Pericardial Thickness2003 · 474 citations
  5. 5Effusive–Constrictive Pericarditis2004 · 348 citations