PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 20260 citations

Evaluating the Effect of Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Workshop on Psychological Distress, Coping Strategies, and Grit Among Primary School Students in Klang Valley, Malaysia.

View Full Paper
JLJanice Ng Wan LengSMSam Jeng MunANAllistair Adam Anak Nelson

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy workshop on psychological distress and coping strategies among primary school students.
  • Quasi-experimental design with randomized selection and allocation of schools
  • Intervention and wait-list groups across 7 primary schools
  • Three quantitative measures assessed at two different time points
  • Significant reduction in anxiety levels (F(1, 1092) = 4.32, p = .038)
  • Improved active coping strategies (F(1, 1092) = 14.87, p < .001)
  • Increased levels of grit (F(1, 1092) = 10.20, p = .001)

Abstract

Early life experiences play a crucial role in shaping children's emotional and psychological development, influencing their self-perception, interpersonal relationships, and ability to regulate stress. Primary school-aged children are particularly vulnerable, as they have limited control over their environment while being increasingly exposed to challenges such as family conflict, peer difficulties, and academic pressure. Without appropriate support, they may adopt maladaptive coping strategies in response to psychological distress. Although mental health issues among children are gaining recognition, access to effective support remains limited due to stigma, financial constraints, and a lack of resources. Therefore, this study examined the effectiveness of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (Brief CBT) workshop on psychological distress, coping strategies, and grit among primary school students in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The study adopted a randomized quasi-experimental design with random selection and allocation of 7 schools to either intervention or wait-list groups, and three quantitative measures were used at two time points to assess the outcomes. Analysis indicated significant intervention effects on Anxiety F (1, 1092) = 4.32, p = .038, Coping Strategies (Active) F (1, 1092) = 14.87, p F (1, 1092) = 10.20, p = .001.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ad1302a1e69014ccf594https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045261433503
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper