PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Energies0 citationsOpen Access

Federated Distributed Scheduling for Hydrogen Production Under Renewable Variability: A Safety-Constrained Evaluation of FedAvg, FedProx, Gossip, and Local Control

View Full Paper
SAShaymaa W. Al-ShammariMTMoahaimen Talib

Key Points

  • Assess safety-constrained coordination for hydrogen production using federated learning approaches.
  • Evaluated federated learning methods: FedAvg, FedProx, and Gossip.
  • Established a Local Control baseline without coordination.
  • Utilized a feasibility-first rule with a pressure violation metric threshold.
  • Conducted extensive simulations to measure cost, demand, and safety outcomes.
  • Local Control achieved a cost of 2131.83 with a pressure violation of 0.172, reducing costs by 37.22% compared to centralized control.
  • Federated Averaging produced a federated policy with a cost of 2423.72 and pressure violation of 0.163.
  • Reported communication overhead of 866,688 transmitted bytes during federated training.

Abstract

Distributed hydrogen refueling stations enable the coupling of renewable generation, storage, and demand fulfillment; however, their performance depends on coordinated control under strict physical safety limits. Centralized controllers are often impractical due to privacy constraints and unreliable communication links, while unconstrained learning can reduce operating costs at the expense of unsafe pressure excursions. Therefore, this study evaluates safety-constrained coordination across multiple stations using federated learning-based distributed scheduling and benchmarks a non-federated Local Control baseline (local-only, no coordination). Using a feasibility-first rule with an acceptance threshold of τ=0.2 on the pressure violation metric (Vp≤0.2), the best feasible overall controller (Local Control) achieved a cost of 2131.83 with pressure violation Vp=0.172, representing a 37.22% reduction relative to a centralized reference cost of 3396.25. Federated training with Federated Averaging and a solar–wind mixing scheme produced the best feasible federated policy (cost 2423.72, Vp=0.163) with 866,688 transmitted bytes. Extensive simulations report cost, unmet demand, safety violations, and communication overhead, demonstrating that feasibility-first selection is essential because lower-cost policies can be unsafe (e.g., cost 1952.27 with Vp=2.63).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Al-Shammari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ad1302a1e69014ccf610https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061406
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A multi-stage framework for coordinated scheduling of networked microgrids in active distribution systems with hydrogen refueling and charging stations2024 · 28 citations
  2. 2Assessing the Quantitative Risk of Urban Hydrogen Refueling Station in Seoul, South Korea, Using SAFETI Model2024 · 20 citations
  3. 3Deep learning for load forecasting with smart meter data: Online Adaptive Recurrent Neural Network2020 · 386 citations
  4. 4Optimal energy management of multiple electricity-hydrogen integrated charging stations2022 · 89 citations
  5. 5Safe Control With Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction Methods for Robotics and Control2023 · 255 citations