PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Psychic Arbitrage Profile Protocol — Dimensional Battery (PAPP-D): A Two-Group Cross-Sectional Study Protocol for Validating an Integrative Dimensional Assessment of Personality Functioning

View Full Paper
LNLAURENȚIU NICULESCU

Key Points

  • The aim is to validate the Psychic Arbitrage Profile Protocol — Dimensional Battery (PAPP-D) as a comprehensive personality functioning assessment.
  • Conducting a two-group cross-sectional study with 100 clinical and 100 non-clinical individuals, matched by age and sex.
  • Testing a five-factor structure through confirmatory factor analysis using 19 indicators.
  • Examining discrepancies between groups and predictive validity related to functional disability via WHODAS 2.0.
  • Implementing a clear statistical analysis plan using specific R packages.
  • Findings will assess the five-factor structure of personality functioning.
  • Results will indicate distinct differences in personality traits across clinical and non-clinical groups.
  • The study will measure the predictive validity of the PAPP-D regarding functional disability.

Abstract

This document presents a complete cross-sectional validation study protocol for the Psychic Arbitrage Profile Protocol — Dimensional Battery (PAPP-D), an integrative assessment framework that operationalizes five process-level dimensions of personality functioning (Accessibility, Liquidity, Transactional Repertoire, Cumulative Cost, Residual Capacity) through established, psychometrically validated self-report instruments. The protocol specifies: (a) a two-group design (clinical n = 100, non-clinical n = 100, frequency-matched on age and sex); (b) a primary hypothesis testing the five-factor structure via confirmatory factor analysis on 19 subscale-level indicators; (c) four secondary hypotheses testing framework-specific discrepancy configurations, incremental prediction of functional disability (WHODAS 2.0), and clinical–non-clinical group differentiation; (d) pre-specified decision rules for model comparison and bifactor interpretation; and (e) a complete statistical analysis plan with specified R packages and reproducibility provisions. The protocol follows SPIROS 2025 reporting guidelines. Results will be reported following STROBE cross-sectional guidelines regardless of outcome direction. Study status: Not yet recruiting. No data have been collected. Protocol version: 3.0 (March 2026). Companion documents: Theoretical framework (Niculescu, 2026; DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18667488). PAPP-D instrument documentation (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18958077). Original PAPP v0.9 instrument (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18651011).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

LAURENȚIU NICULESCU (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ad6c02a1e69014ccf718https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18957907
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Psychic Arbitrage Profile Protocol — Dimensional Battery (PAPP-D): A Two-Group Cross-Sectional Study Protocol for Validating an Integrative Dimensional Assessment of Personality Functioning2026
  2. 2Psychic Arbitrage Profile Protocol (PAPP): Instrument Documentation, Version 0.92026
  3. 3Bridging ICD-11 Dimensional Personality Assessment and Psychodynamic Functioning: The Psychic Arbitrage Profile Protocol (PAPP)2026
  4. 4Construct Validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality – Self-Report Form (CAPP-SR)2024
  5. 5A novel self-report instrument (APPA) to measure psychotic symptoms – development and content validity2025