PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Current Opinion in Urology2 citations

Stone fragmentation in percutaneous surgery: is there a paradigm shift?

View Full Paper
SSStefano SchininàABA. BarrettaRSRiccardo Schiavina

Key Points

  • This review assesses the evolution of stone fragmentation technologies in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
  • Review of recent literature on stone fragmentation methods
  • Comparison of mechanical and laser-based lithotripsy techniques
  • Evaluation of suction-enabled access sheaths in stone surgery
  • Shift from mechanical lithotripsy to laser-driven dusting techniques
  • Improvements in operative efficiency and intrarenal pressure control
  • Comparable stone-free rates reported between techniques

Abstract

Purpose of review Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the gold standard for the treatment of large and complex renal calculi. Traditionally, stone fragmentation during PCNL has relied on mechanical lithotripsy combined with manual or passive fragment extraction. This review examines whether recent advances in stone fragmentation and evacuation technologies represent a true paradigm shift in percutaneous stone surgery or rather a progressive refinement of established principles. Recent findings Recent literature highlights a progressive transition from conventional mechanical lithotripsy – based on ultrasonic, pneumatic, or dual-energy devices – towards laser-based fragmentation strategies, particularly in miniaturized PCNL. While mechanical systems remain highly effective in standard-tract PCNL, their efficiency and applicability may be limited as access calibre decreases. In this setting, holmium:YAG and thulium fibre lasers, supported by advanced pulse modulation technologies, enable efficient dust-oriented fragmentation through small-calibre tracts. The parallel introduction of suction-enabled access sheaths has further modified clearance dynamics, allowing simultaneous fragmentation and active evacuation. Comparative studies consistently report comparable stone-free rates (SFRs) between traditional and contemporary approaches, with improvements in operative efficiency, intrarenal pressure control, and procedural workflow favouring laser-based and suction-assisted systems. Summary Overall, current evidence supports a shift in PCNL from mechanical fragmentation and fragment extraction towards laser-driven dusting combined with active aspiration. This evolution appears to prioritize efficiency and physiological safety rather than absolute gains in stone-free rates. However, its broader adoption remains dependent on cost, equipment availability, and training, underscoring the need for further comparative and implementation-focused research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schininà et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ad7918185d8a39800c33https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000001379
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evolution of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) from Standard to Miniaturized and Ultra-Mini Techniques: A Narrative Review2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Energy sources in percutaneous surgery. Are lasers ready to become the gold standard? A narrative review.2026
  3. 3Comparing laser vs mechanical lithotripsy in suction mini‐PCNL for kidney stone disease: A prospective multicentre study by the endourology section of EAU2025
  4. 4Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Five Categories of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Control Trials2025
  5. 5Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an overview2024