PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Randomised Field Trial Methodology for Evaluating Maintenance Depot Risk Reduction in Ghana

View Full Paper
AAAbena Serwaa AdjeiNBNana Ama BoatengKMKofi Mensah

Key Points

  • This article presents a novel protocol for evaluating safety interventions at maintenance depots in Ghana.
  • Cluster-randomised, waitlist-controlled design
  • Randomisation at the depot level
  • Interventions include safety upgrades and revised protocols
  • Analysis using linear mixed models with cluster-robust standard errors
  • No empirical results presented; feasibility shown through pilot study
  • Pilot indicated a likelihood of 30% risk reduction at 80% power
  • Intra-cluster correlation coefficient was 0.05

Abstract

"background": "Transport maintenance depots in Ghana are critical infrastructure nodes where systemic safety and operational risks are concentrated. Current risk assessment methodologies are largely observational and lack rigorous causal inference for evaluating intervention effectiveness. ", "purpose and objectives": "This article presents a novel methodological framework for conducting a randomised field trial to causally evaluate engineering and procedural interventions aimed at reducing depot-wide risk. The primary objective is to detail a protocol for randomisation, measurement, and analysis suitable for complex, operational industrial environments. ", "methodology": "The methodology employs a cluster-randomised, waitlist-controlled design. Depots are the unit of randomisation. The core intervention is a bundled package of engineered safety upgrades and revised maintenance protocols. Primary outcome is a composite risk score derived from audit checklists and incident data. The analysis uses a linear mixed model: Y{ij = \0 + \1 Tij + uj +, where Yij is the risk score for depot j at time i, Tij is the treatment indicator, uj is a depot random effect, and is the error term. Inference is based on cluster-robust standard errors. ", "findings": "As a methodology article, this paper presents no empirical trial results. However, the proposed design is shown to be feasible through a pilot study, which indicated a high likelihood of detecting a clinically meaningful risk reduction of 30% with 80% power, given an intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0. 05. ", "conclusion": "The outlined randomised field trial methodology provides a robust, evidence-based framework for evaluating depot risk reduction strategies, overcoming limitations of prior quasi-experimental approaches. ", "recommendations": "Researchers applying this methodology should conduct thorough site-specific power analyses, ensure blinding of outcome assessors, and plan for intent-to-treat analysis to maintain trial integrity in operational settings. ", "key words": "randomised controlled trial

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adjei et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ad7918185d8a39800d92https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18971746
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper