PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Neuro-Oncology Pediatrics0 citationsOpen Access

MODL-01.  In-vivo evaluation of the cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effect of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in SHH-activated/TP53-mutant medulloblastoma subgroup.

View Full Paper
JSJuliana Cristina Lourenço de SouzaRQRosane Gomes de Paula QueirózLSLetícia Tshikawa dos Santos

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of arsenic trioxide on tumor progression and survival in TP53-mutant medulloblastoma.
  • Used orthotopic TP53-mutant medulloblastoma xenografts in animal models.
  • Administered arsenic trioxide at 5 mg/kg/day for 10 days and radiotherapy in 3 fractions.
  • Monitored treatment effects via bioluminescence imaging and evaluated survival rates.
  • No significant survival differences between treatment groups were observed.
  • Arsenic trioxide combined with radiotherapy showed initial reduction in tumor bioluminescence but not sustained benefits.
  • Molecular studies using RNAseq may provide insights into mechanisms of arsenic trioxide action.

Abstract

Abstract Patients with medulloblastoma (MB) of the SHH-activated/TP53-mutant subgroup have a particularly unfavorable prognosis, despite standard treatment. To assess whether arsenic trioxide (ATO; a SHH-pathway inhibitor) has cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects with an impact on survival in animal models of MB we studied the efficacy of ATO alone or combined with radiotherapy (RT) in TP53-mutant MB xenografts. Orthotopic tumor models were generated using a DAOY cell line, transfected with luciferase. After tumor establishment, the animals (n = 34) were divided into four treatment groups: group 01 (control; n = 9), group 02 (ATO; n = 8), group 03 (radiotherapy; n = 8), and group 04 (ATO associated with radiotherapy; n = 9). ATO was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneally, for 10 consecutive days, and radiotherapy was administered in 3 fractions (180cGy/fraction) on alternate days. The animals were monitored clinically and through weekly bioluminescence imaging. Survival rates, tumor progression by bioluminescence intensity, and anatomopathological findings were evaluated. There was no significant difference in the survival of the animals in the different treatment groups. Immediately after treatment, the group that received ATO+RT had a significant reduction in tumor bioluminescence. Yet, this antitumoral effect was not maintained in subsequent evaluations. There were no significant differences in the anatomopathological findings (tumor size, necrosis, and mitotic indexes) between groups. ATO, alone or combined with RT, did not produce signs of recognizable systemic toxicity. The combination of ATO with RT was not capable of increasing survival in animals with TP53-mutated MB SHH in this preclinical model. Molecular studies using the RNAseq technique are being performed and may reveal new relevant findings regarding the molecular mechanism of ATO action on the SHH pathway. These results reinforce that, although many advances have been made in the molecular basis of MB subtypes, translating them into new effective therapies remains challenging. Support: CNPq and FAEPA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Souza et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4adc718185d8a398019edhttps://doi.org/10.1093/neuped/wuaf001.290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper