PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Religions0 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence and Interreligious Dialogue: Emerging Implications for Faith-Based Organizations

View Full Paper
JCJeff Clyde G. Corpuz

Key Points

  • To explore the implications of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence for Faith-Based Organizations in interreligious dialogue.
  • Employs a practical-theological methodology with four steps: descriptive-empirical, interpretive, normative, and pragmatic.
  • Maps current AI applications and conducts interdisciplinary interpretation informed by social and ethical analysis.
  • Evaluates theological norms to assess opportunities and risks of AI in interreligious dialogue.
  • Identifies three dimensions shaping AI integration: Ethics, Technology, and Humans.
  • Suggests responsible AI adoption practices for Faith-Based Organizations.
  • Introduces the AI–IRD Integration Framework to guide ethical AI usage in dialogue.

Abstract

This article advances a constructive theological account of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) for Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs) engaged in interreligious dialogue (IRD). Drawing on a practical–theological methodology, the study follows four interrelated steps—descriptive–empirical, interpretive, normative, and pragmatic—to examine how AI-enabled practices such as translation, textual analysis, and cross-scriptural synthesis are reshaping contemporary forms of dialogue among religious and non-religious communities. Through the empirical mapping of current AI applications, interdisciplinary interpretation informed by social and ethical analysis, and normative theological evaluation, the study identifies both the opportunities and risks of AI-mediated IRD. On this basis, it synthesizes three interdependent dimensions that structure the proposed framework: (1) Ethics, which clarifies the moral purpose and values guiding AI use; (2) Technology, which addresses mediation, governance, and power in AI systems; and (3) Humans, which centers institutional responsibility, agency, and sustainability within FBOs. From this synthesis, the article introduces an AI–IRD Integration Framework that translates theological and ethical reflection into practical guidance for responsible AI adoption. The study contributes an original interdisciplinary perspective that equips religious leaders, theologians, policymakers, and faith communities to engage AI not merely as a tool, but as a human-centered partner in fostering inclusive, sustainable, and ethically grounded dialogue in an era of AI–human coexistence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jeff Clyde G. Corpuz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4adc718185d8a39801b8ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/rel17030354
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper